In 'defense' war programs researchers in the USA UK Russia and Germany have genetically engineered biological weapons agents, building new deadly strains.
German military researchers at the Santitaetsakademie der Bundeswehr in Munich the main BW research facility of the German army cultured genetically engineered Francisella tularensis subsp holarctica bacteria. This is a close relative of the causative agent of tularaemia.
An antibiotic resistance marker gene tetracyclin has been inserted into these bacteria.
|
Genetic engineering can be used to broaden the classical bioweapons arsenal.
Through genetic engineering bacteria can not only be made resistant to antibiotics or vaccines. They can also be made even more toxic harder to detect or more stable in the environment.
By using genetic methods that are standard procedures in thousands of labs worldwide bioweapons can be made more virulent easier to handle and harder to fight. In short: more effective. |
Genetic engineering regularly used to produce lethal bacteria
click here |
UK/US The Dorset Biological Warfare Experiments 1963-75
click here |
And so it creeps |
Why Is Damning New Evidence About Monsanto's Most Widely Used Herbicide Being Silenced?
click here |
| Antibodies from women with infertility used in creation of GMO food
Antibodies from women with infertility, using genetic engineering techniques, has been inserted into genes of ordinary corn seeds used to produce corn plants
Thus producing a concealed contraceptive embedded in corn meant for human consumption.
“Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm.
They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward.”
Spermicides hidden in GMO corn provided to starving Third World populations through the generosity of the Gates’ foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Kofi Annan’s AGRA are many and profound.
In India a bill was introduced to make it a crime to question the safety of GMOs (including in vaccines) with prison terms attached.
GE-corn, GE-soy, GE-cotton seed oil, GE-canola, are in most processed foods in the US.
|
GMO food as bioweapons
click here |
|
Indigenous schools in Canada were established and run jointly by the Vatican and the Crown of England in 1834 and continued until 1996.
Children were forcibly removed from their indigenous homes against their parents wishes and forced to attend the schools.
Nearly half of the 150,000 children in these schools died because of treatment and conditions at the schools a favorite trick of Illuminati and elite power structure working to reduce unwanted populations.
|
Call for boycott over aborted fetal cell lines
click here |
|
Published on Sunday, April 24, 2005 by the Independent/UK
GM Industry Puts Human Gene into Rice
by Geoffrey Lean
|
|
Scientists have begun putting genes from human beings into food crops in a dramatic extension of genetic modification. The move, which is causing disgust and revulsion among critics, is bound to strengthen accusations that GM technology is creating "Frankenstein foods" and drive the controversy surrounding it to new heights.
Even before this development, many people, including Prince Charles, have opposed the technology on the grounds that it is playing God by creating unnatural combinations of living things.
Environmentalists say that no one will want to eat the partially human-derived food because it will smack of cannibalism.
But supporters say that the controversial new departure presents no ethical problems and could bring environmental benefits.
In the first modification of its kind, Japanese researchers have inserted a gene from the human liver into rice to enable it to digest pesticides and industrial chemicals. The gene makes an enzyme, code-named CPY2B6, which is particularly good at breaking down harmful chemicals in the body.
Present GM crops are modified with genes from bacteria to make them tolerate herbicides, so that they are not harmed when fields are sprayed to kill weeds. But most of them are only able to deal with a single herbicide, which means that it has to be used over and over again, allowing weeds to build up resistance to it.
But the researchers at the National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences in Tsukuba, north of Tokyo, have found that adding the human touch gave the rice immunity to 13 different herbicides. This would mean that weeds could be kept down by constantly changing the chemicals used.
|
|
Supporting scientists say that the gene could also help to beat pollution.
Professor Richard Meilan of Purdue University in Indiana, who has worked with a similar gene from rabbits, says that plants modified with it could "clean up toxins" from contaminated land. They might even destroy them so effectively that crops grown on the polluted soil could be fit to eat.
But he and other scientists caution that if the gene were to escape to wild relatives of the rice it could create particularly vicious superweeds that were resistant to a wide range of herbicides.
He adds: "I do not have any ethical issue with using human genes to engineer plants", dismissing talk of "Frankenstein foods" as "rubbish". He believes that that European opposition to GM crops and food is fuelled by agricultural protectionism.
But Sue Mayer, director of GeneWatch UK, said yesterday: "I don't think that anyone will want to buy this rice. People have already expressed disgust about using human genes, and already feel that their concerns are being ignored by the biotech industry. This will just undermine their confidence even more."
Pete Riley, director of the anti-GM pressure group Five Year Freeze, said: "I am not surprised by this.
"The industry is capable of anything and this development certainly smacks of Frankenstein."
© 2005 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd
Common Dreams © 1997-2005 |
|
MON 863 — Rats fed Monsanto GM corn due for sale in Britain developed abnormalities in blood and kidneys
|
Rats fed on a diet rich in genetically modified corn developed abnormalities to internal organs and changes to their blood, raising fears that human health could be affected by eating GM food.
The Independent on Sunday can today reveal details of secret research carried out by Monsanto, the GM food giant, which shows that rats fed the modified corn had smaller kidneys and variations in the composition of their blood.
According to the confidential 1,139-page report, these health problems were absent from another batch of rodents fed non-GM food as part of the research project.
The disclosures come as European countries, including Britain, prepare to vote on whether the GM-modified corn should go on sale to the public.
A vote last week by the European Union failed to secure agreement over whether the product should be sold here, after Britain and nine other countries voted in favor.
Forced into retirement
...That research, which was roundly denounced by ministers and the British scientific establishment, was halted and Dr Arpad Pusztai, the scientist behind the controversial findings, was forced into retirement amid a huge row over the claim.
Dr Pusztai reported a "huge list of significant differences" between rats fed GM and conventional corn, saying the results strongly indicate that eating significant amounts of it can damage health.
|
The new study is into a corn, codenamed MON 863, which has been modified by Monsanto to protect itself against corn rootworm, which the company describes as "one of the most pernicious pests affecting maize crops around the world".
|
|
GM: New study shows unborn babies could be harmed
Mortality rate for new-born rats six times higher when mother was fed on a diet of modified soya
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor Published: 08 January 2006 |
|
|
©2006 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd. All rights reserved |
|
Oxford UniversityTorture factory for animals
The story so far:
At the beginning of 2004, Oxford University claimed that the site on South Parks Rd was to be an 'Animal Hotel'.
They said that "no experiments would be carried out there and there would be no primates".
These statements were to mark the start of a series of lies and misinformation that has proven to be the norm for Oxford University.
|
|
Oxford University later issued a statement which contradicted their initial claims, finally admitting that "the facility will be used to experiment on animals".
Oxford University believes it has no reason to inform the outside world about the nature of animal experiments carried out within its facilities.
A closer look at their research on animals at the university reveals exactly why they are so desperate to keep the lid on the new lab.
An experiment published in Nature in 2002 described how ten week old kittens had one eye sewn together and had a part of their skull removed to expose the brain.
In 2003 another published paper highlights the long-term nature of animal suffering inside Oxford University.
artificially produced brain damage.
Artificially produced brain damage
Three Rhesus Macaque monkeys with artificially produced brain damage were subjected to a variety of tests.
artificially produced brain damage
Two of the monkeys involved in this experiement had part of their brains removed ten years previously whey they were five years old.
|
|
A leading Oxford Professor claimed that the monkeys experimented on lived "the life of Riley" and that "there was no pain or stress."
These words are from a researcher who has routinely inflicted brain damage on highly intelligent and sensitive creatures and who's own published papers describe how after on experiment the monkeys required 'intensive nursing' to keep them alive.
Oxford University has sought to impose a draconian injunction on those involved in a legal and peaceful campaign against the new animal lab on South Park Rd in order to stop them highlighting the lies told by the University.
|
|
'Asset'
The London Times newspaper reported that police had investigated a case of cruelty against a leading professor at Oxford University.
The article stated that the professor had refused to have a monkey that was suffering put out of its misery because he described it as an 'asset'.
This intransigence persisted despite please from the university's own vet to end the animal's suffering.
It was only after a direct intervention by the Home Office that this poor creature's torment was ended. |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||
Number 10's wildlife experts warn against GM damage
Mark Townsend Sunday October 19, 2003 Chief wildlife advisers have dealt another massive blow to the case for genetically modified (GM) crops, warning that the technology will 'seriously degrade' swaths of countryside. In a damning report, English Nature also warns that the use of GM oilseed rape and sugar beet would speed up the loss of farmland birds. Replacing conventional oilseed rape with GM varieties would be similarly disastrous, according to the Government's conservation experts, who say the crop is Britain's most important for providing feed for birds, producing up to 30 times more sustenance than the average cereal field. Fears are mounting that species such as the skylark could be extinct in 20 years if GM farming goes ahead. Populations in areas like the east of England, which has a large concentration of oilseed rape, are at particular risk. Details of English Nature's report — to be submitted as key evidence when the Government decides whether to pursue the commercial growing of GM crops — come days after the most extensive trials ever suggested the technology could destroy populations of butterflies, bees and birds. Results of the trials have hardened already widespread opposition to the technology with The Observer learning that the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), which has more than a million members, has begun exploring the prospect of legal action if GM crops are approved. Elsewhere, campaign group Greengloves has promised to amass a 10,000-strong army of supporters prepared to risk imprisonment by ripping up GM crops if they are planted across the countryside. Dr Brian Johnson, biotechnology expert for English Nature, said: 'These crops would seriously degrade biodiversity over a short period. 'Clearly, this would take farming in the opposite direction from the Government's stated objectives of farming less intensely and enhancing farmland bird populations.' English Nature's views will be presented this month to the Government's Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment, whose recommendations will prove pivotal on whether GM crops should be grown commercially, a decision that will not be made by Ministers until April. However, there are signs that Blair may be preparing to backtrack on the technology, following evidence that it will harm Britain's biodiversity. 'This is a big deal for the credibility of the Government's environmental agenda as well as a big deal for farmland birds,' said Dr Mark Avery, the RSPB's director of conservation. The charity will mount a massive lobbying campaign aimed at MPs if GM crops are allowed to be sown commercially in the UK. Influential opposition can also be found from Britain's biggest landowner — the National Trust — which is balloting its three million members on whether a temporary ban on GM should be introduced until environmental concerns are investigated further. The level of antipathy will be known at its annual meeting, with sources suggesting views will echo that of the Government's official GM debate, where nine out of 10 voted against the technology. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003 |
| Illuminati
The US house, the US Senate, the US Supreme Court!
Utter lawlessness and criminality! Europe Rothschild Illuminati — The CIA — Obama Illuminati — for war and death, environmental disaster, financial collapse Behavior modification Phenomenological — structures of consciousness — programs |
Global weather, environment and climate change — Global youth climate movement |
|
Unspeakable grief and horror
...and the circus of deception killing continues... |
|
For archives, these articles are being stored on TheWE.cc website.The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. |