1984 - George Orwell.

The following previews have been rated for all audiances.

By the Ministry of Information

R - Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984  George Orwell - Big Brother at the top.

Inner Party two percent - 2 percent - 2% of population.

Outer Party thirteen percent - 13 percent - 13% of population.

Proles eight-five percent - 85 percent - 85% of population.

Image: wikipedia
If There is Hope, it must Lie in the Proles
Kewe translation from essay by Prof. James F. Tracy, Global Research, August 26, 2012.
While Outer Party members of the 1984 novel withstood more austere conditions, in our society the well-informed have news equally carefully selected, crafted, and presented.
Such information disseminated via actors, news or drama, on cable and broadcast television platforms, mainstream radio eloquence and falsity, and movie images and words from the cinema screens.
A college educated professionals has the duty to adhere to such opinions as outlined from the New York Times, Washington Post, and National Public Radio.
Mystified by their own credentials, surrounded by peers who conceive of reality within the corporate media’s overwhelming tide of disinformation, much of today’s professional class is impervious to that termed 'conspiracy theories.'
Programming necessary to attain such a degree of self-assuredness distances one from reality.
For example, revulsion towards war in the United States historically has run strongest among the non-or semi-skilled, working class majority.
Historian Howard Zinn:
Surveys of public opinion during the Vietnam War had people with the highest education — college graduates — as the most supportive of the war.
People who had not graduated from high school were the ones most against the war.
While intellectuals, students and college professors, were most visible in the anti-war movement, public opinion against the war was concentrated in the least educated classes.
A recent poll by the Pew Research Center for People and the Press shows that on March 19, 2011, one week before President Obama announced the NATO bombing of Libya, 77% of the US public opposed the destruction of the country’s air defenses.
Polling one year later revealed a 62% majority against NATO “bombing Syrian military forces to protect anti-government groups in Syria,” even though 64% admitted to having heard 'little' or 'nothing at all' on recent 'political violence in Syria.'
A majority of the population despite ceaseless propaganda still recognize how war, and all that ensues, remains the supreme crime.
The Proles, Orwell wrote, in those swarming disregarded masses — eighty-five percent of the population — could force the destruction of the Party.
The 'Inner Party' being today the Democrats and Republicans, the Conservative and Labour politicians, the Judiciary, the bankers and mega-corporate heads.
The 'Outer Party' being college educated professionals and police agents who are paid well to obey the commands of the Inner Party — Inner Party commands brought forth by their own criminality, and on instructions of those in the shadows who rule from the top.
Big Bother is watching you.

1984  George Orwell - Big Brother at the top.

Inner Party two percent - 2 percent - 2% of population.

Outer Party thirteen percent - 13 percent - 13% of population.

Proles eight-five percent - 85 percent - 85% of population.

Image: wikipedia
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
1984 movie

One more brainwashing reinforcement
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.

A 'Big Brother' — someone to see as human, with a wife and family.

Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.

The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing

A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:   fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.

Obama, an almost perfect candidate for the never-ending game.  

Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.

Photo: 1984 movie
Endless 9-11's
It should be obvious to those who visit this site that there is something very 'fishy' about the Christmas day plane incident.
With regard to the smell that is.
Accepting there are millions of people who would like to see something of a not pleasant nature take place with regard to America's interests is a likely posit.
But then having the incidents take place as they did:
1.   American intelligence fully warned and tracking the individual.
2.   The father, someone who had worked with the CIA on numerous occasions, warning that same agency of his son.
3.   The need to have some 'justification' for the killing of men women and children by the US military in Yemen — there are photographs on this very page, posted days before Christmas, of US massacre of families in Yemen.
4.   The publication of Obama signing consent for these US massacres on Yemen, weeks before Christmas — the day he accepted the Norwegian peace prize?
Well 'fishy' is not the word — deliberate activity by US and Illuminati black ops to cause the incident is appropriate.
As 9-11, a devised war game played out
One more brainwashing reinforcement
.
Obama spewing nonsense and lies way before he became the country's 'leader ' continues the game for the television watching public.
Obama a 'Big Brother' — someone to see, with a wife and family.
Orchestrated lies given to a public increasingly absorbed in non-life by the monster of the brain-washing instrument.
The newer televisions now coming at people with their physical attributes of brainwashing.
A process of radiation wavelengths spewing from the instrument to bring that which is required for the moment:  fear, anger, acceptance of an individual's smallness in the greater political venue, then the recognition of helplessness and submission.
Obama, an almost perfect 'Big Brother' for the never-ending game.
Orwell did not have the understanding of radionic physical brainwashing when he wrote 1984, he only understood the mass hypnotic reality that could be imposed with film and television.
1984 — the movie
1984 — produced in 1954 movie
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Even the names of the four Ministries by which we are governed exhibit a sort of impudence in their deliberate reversal of the facts.
The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war.
The Ministry of Truth with lies.
The Ministry of Love with torture.
And the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.
These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.
For it is only by reconciling contradictions that power can be retained indefinitely.
In no other way could the ancient cycle be broken.
If human equality is to be for ever averted — if the High, as we have called them, are to keep their places permanently — then the prevailing mental condition must be controlled insanity.
      George Orwell 1984      
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet

Apple patents tech to let cops switch off iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
Nick Farrell in Rome
07 Aug 2013 11:52
Police forces around the world have had the problem that when their officers get a bit carried away and start pepper spraying tied captives there is someone on hand filming the event on their mobile phones.
While six police lay into prone grannies on the floor with long batons, the pictures can be on the net in seconds, meaning supervisors have to answer embarrassing questions.
Apple patents tech to let cops switch off iPhone video, camera and wi-fi.

Photo: internet
But they may not need to fear scrutiny much longer - Apple has patented a piece of technology which would allow government and police to block transmission of information, including video and photographs, whenever they like.
All the coppers have to do is decide that a public gathering or venue is deemed 'sensitive', and needs to be 'protected from externalities' and Apple will switch off all its gear.
The police can then get on with the very difficult task of kettling protesters without having to worry about a few beating anyone to death.
Covert police or government operations
Apple insists that the affected sites are mostly cinemas, theatres, concert grounds and similar locations, but it does admit that it could be used in 'covert police or government operations which may require complete blackout conditions'.
According to RT it could also be used to prevent whistleblowers like Edward Snowden from taking pictures and broadcasting them on the interent.
Apple said that the wireless transmission of sensitive information to a remote source is one example of a threat to security.
But it said that this sensitive information could be anything from classified government information to questions or answers to an examination administered in an academic setting.
Apple patented the means to transmit an encoded signal to all wireless devices, commanding them to disable recording functions.
The policies would be activated by GPS, and wi-fi or mobile base-stations, which would ring-fence (geofence) around a building or a 'sensitive area' to prevent phone cameras from taking pictures or recording video.
Odd that the company made famous by its 1984 Big Brother video can't really see what it is doing.
Perhaps its own secretive culture and an overzealous security treatment of its staff have fostered sympathy for Big Brother after all.
Click here for TechEye.net
All content © 2013 JAM IT Media Ltd
NATO
1984 everlasting
War is Peace
The object of waging war is always to be in a better position to wage another war ‽
by Ross Ruthenberg
NATO provoking war.

The object of waging war is always to be in a better position to wage another war

Image: globalresearch.ca
Provoking a long term cold war that may at any time go hot
In the spirit of the NATO Summit in Chicago, I present a few quotes from that textbook-for- tomorrow George Orwell book 1984:
"If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say this or that even, it never happened-that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death."
"All rulers in all ages have tried to impose a false view of the world upon their followers."
"Then the face of Big Brother faded away and instead the three slogans of the Party stood out in bold capitals:
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH"
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?
Has it ever occurred to your, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?
The whole climate of thought will be different.
In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now:
Orthodoxy means not thinking —
not needing to think.
Orthodoxy is unconsciousness."
"Once when he happened in some connexion to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening.
The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, 'just to keep people frightened'.
This was an idea that had literally never occurred to him."
"The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour.
War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent."
"The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture, and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.
These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in DOUBLETHINK.
For it is only by reconciling contradictions that power can be retained indefinitely."
"He also said they were wrong in equating the military alliance to a 'war machine.'
If that's the basis for the protests, it's actually based on lack of knowledge."
"Our organization is a peace movement."
Oh wait!
That's not the Ministry of Truth speaking, that's NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen!
Anders Fogh Rasmussen

That's not the Ministry of Truth speaking, that's NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen!
	
Photo: AP/Miguel Tovar
Anders Fogh Rasmussen
I and so many others have struggled to understand why we need a world 'war machine' in society today and finally, Fogh Rasmussen, NATO's titular leader, has provided the enlightenment:
NATO is a 'peace movement' ‽
I now understand that the NATO dropping of the most bombs since WWII on Yugoslavia in the early '90s was actually just blanketing the area with peace droppings.
Clarity now exists for NATO's recent peace initiative in Libya, i.e. just exercising their Responsibility to Protect, using the tools of peace such as missiles, bombs, etc.
NATO's decade long Afghanistan mission comes into view as actually one of "spreading peace" near and far while roundly scolding the indigenous folks if they didn't understand.
Then there is the on-going U.S. and NATO supported march towards peace in Syria, with assistance from many of Syria's friends such as Saudi Arabia.
Syria's leader, Assad, just doesn't seem to get it that War is Peace and peace is what is being thrust upon him and his country, gushing in from Turkey, Iraq, etc.
Russia should not be concerned about the ring of Aegis missile systems being deployed around them, as it is merely a 'friendship ring of peace.'
Finally, well not really finally, as '1984' reminds us that: 'The object of waging a war is always to be in a better position in which to wage another war' (reminder: war is peace), which now makes clear to me and hopefully the millions of citizens of Iran that they should just hold on through the many debilitating sanctions being imposed upon them, because peace is coming!
NATO and friends/partners are even now preparing their peace offerings and delivery tools because they fully understand their responsibility to protect you!    Peace to all!
Everything faded into mist.
The past was erased.
The erasure was forgotten.
The lie became truth.
For article and bottom note click here
A trial would bring forth the truth of Mossad and Cheney and the rest involved in 9/11
WHY NO TRIAL
Osama bin Laden son asks why their unarmed father was killed, why he could not be placed on trial!
The son knows of course that the US government could never place Osama on trial!
That would bring out their unreality of the events of 9-11!
A trial would bring forth the truth of Mossad and that an elite US cabal including Cheney are responsible for the destruction of those buildings — and the lives taken!
BBC — always with the mass mind-control
This photo of Osama bin Laden son taken January 23 2008 asks why their unarmed father was killed, why he could not be placed on trial!

WHY NO TRIAL

They no of course that the US government could never place Osama on trial!

That would bring out their unreality of the events of 9-11!

A trial would bring forth the truth of Mossad and that an elite US cabal including Cheney are responsible for the destruction of those buildings — and the lives taken! 

Photo: Reuters
This picture above on the BBC website does not tell you the photo is a picture taken of Omar on January 23 2008.
One could speculate the BBC in displaying this half-smiling stance are saying:  'Look!  This is how the son thinks of the death of this father.!
More subtle brain-washing by the BBC!
They are very good at propaganda and mass mind-control!
Eric Blair also known as George Orwell worked for them — he wrote a book about it!
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
911 World Trade Center Building 7 - Controlled Demolition Experts Agree

Steve Luce Former US Army Combat Engineer, Explosive Demolition of Structures:  When I saw building 7 fall, to me it appeared to be controlled demolition because it fell in freefall manner into itself.

It is my opinion as a former 12 Bravo combat engineer, well trained in the use of explosives, that all three buildings, World Trade Center Twin Towers 1 and 2 and World Trade Center building 7, were brought down as a result of controlled demolitions.

2,606 people lost their lives in the World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001.

125 people lost their lives at the Pentagon on 9/11.

246 people lost their lives on the four planes on 9/11.

Image: ae911truth.org
Steve Luce:
When I saw building 7 fall, to me it appeared to be controlled demolition because it fell in freefall manner into itself.
It is my opinion as a former 12 Bravo combat engineer, well trained in the use of explosives, that all three buildings were brought down as a result of controlled demolitions.
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Psychopaths
Psychopaths and Alters
AIPAC
Obama
Supreme Court judges
AIPAC psychopaths and Obama. 

Photo: rense.com
Elite psychopaths enjoy hurt and killing.
Within these elite psychopaths who rise to the highest positions there is inside an emotional void while upon the outside an ability to appear outwardly normal — to display whatever emotion is considered required.
Psychopaths do not experience shame guilt or remorse — their attitude to people who are not psychopaths is contempt.
Using superficial charm, elite psychopaths are willing to say anything to anyone without concern for accuracy or truth.
Traits of psychopaths
 1.   Glibness/superficial charm
 2.   Grandiose sense of self-worth
 3.   Pathological lying
 4.   Cunning/manipulative
 5.   Lack of remorse or guilt
 7.   Callous/lack of empathy
 8.   Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
 9.   Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
10.   Parasitic lifestyle
11.   Promiscuous sexual behavior
All that matters to these 'intraspecies predators' is that the potential consequences of their actions bring a high that they can experience from the harm and pain that they cause.
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Drone strike by Obama
Child killed by drone strike.

War criminal Obama.

Illuminati -  CIA - Obama

Behavior modification - phenomenological structures of consciousness programs.

Image: AFP/Getty images
Drone strike killings by Obama
click here for its own page
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Difficult for normal person to except reality of 9-11
The difficulty for normal human people who experience emotional empathy is that they cannot understand a non-empathetic human or non-human 'alien' psychopathic mind!
The psychopath lives in a world the empathetic human cannot reach!
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Psychopaths enjoying the high
— a front Alter uncertain
Clinton Gates and the US military psychopaths enjoying the high experienced from the supposed killing of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad Pakistan.

Elite psychopaths enjoy hurt and killing for within those who rise to the highest positions there is inside an emotional void while upon the outside an ability to appear outwardly normal — to display whatever emotion they consider is required. 

Psychopaths do not experience shame, guilt, or remorse for their actions — their attitude to people who are not psychopaths is contempt.

Using superficial charm, elite psychopaths are willing to say anything to anyone without concern for accuracy or truth.

All that matter to these 'intraspecies predators' is that the potential consequences of their actions bring a high that they can experience from the harm and pain that they cause.

Image: US government
Image: US government
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Killing unarmed Osama bin Laden ‘doesn’t serve justice’
— British Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams
Comment from Kewe:
Well we don't know if the death actually took place or if this is another staged event.
I would like to hear from the wife and the daughter before making any final assertion.
Why?   Because we know that the present established US Congress, US President, Government and Supreme Court is now nothing more than ongoing acts of falsehood and deception.
That everything they do is within the framework of falsehood deception and corruption.
But saying Osama was killed in this incident, then the Archbishops comments are refreshing to hear and more than appropriate.
There is a basic morality within the Universe — Americans and those in the west and elsewhere on the planet who forget such do so at their peril!
One must remember that Osama within his framework of understanding was a moral man — a man who wished only to rid the Arabic countries of American domination!
And we must remembet that 9-11 was a creation of a cabal of various elite in the US using Mossad and US black-budget agencies.
Here below is an abbreviated comment from Pat that also is appropriate:
Why does the archbishop wish to involve himself in President Obama’s fairy-tale when he has his own fairy-tale to deal with.
Let Obama find his way out of his fable by clicking his heels or whatever other magic he cares to use.
( 'Clicking his heels' a metaphor for that which takes place when the magic shoes in the Wizard of Oz are clicked — themes words and actions taken from the many books of Oz by L Frank Baum are used in Illuminati/US military/US black-budget mind control programming including the clicking sound 'the clicking of heels' to activate such programming.
Someone who has psychopathic tendencies can be mind-controlled into altered personalities that are both psychopathic and empathic.
While there is a downside if the core essence is psychopathic — and may at some moment decide to take its own course — in most instances having psychopathic tendencies forced by programmed early childhood trauma is an added benefit to the controller in that the work in disabling a range of Alter personalities in the mind — with regard to their empathic tendency — has already been done.   It is easier to restore empathy — the ability to identify with another's feelings — for a front Alter personality to use, than to take empathy away. )
In reality Obama is not the US President, can not be for his birth removes him from that position by the US constitution.
That Obama would deliberately present a false birth certificate and appear on TV with the falsity blown up behind him, well that if nothing else explains much about the present!
Kewe
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
The frayed threads anchoring the American government to reality have finally snapped, just at the moment radiologists are reporting that Americans are getting too fat to be x-rayed or shoved into any existing MRI tube.
The gamma rays can't get through the blubber, same way actual conditions in the outside world bounces off the impenetrable dome of imbecility sheltering America's political leadership.
Behind ramparts guarded by a coalition of liars extending from Rupert Murdoch to the New York Times, from Bill O'Reilly to PBS, America is totally shielded from truth.
Here we have a Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, who gazes at the rubble of Lebanon, 300,000 refugees being strafed with Israel's cluster bombs, and squeaks happily that we are "witnessing the birth pangs of a new Middle East."
Here we have a president, G. Bush, who urges Vladimir Putin to commence in Russia the same "institutional change" that is making Iraq a beacon of freedom and free expression.
Not long after Bush extended this ludicrous invitation the UN relayed from Iraq's Ministry of Health Iraq's real casualty rate, which was running at least 100 a day.
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
H.D.S. GREENWAY

The return of '1984'

By H.D.S. Greenway | June 24, 2005
IF YOU TAKE something to read at the beach this summer make sure it is not one of George Orwell's books. The comparison with current events will ruin your day.
In what was then the futuristic, nightmare world of "1984," written in 1949, Orwell introduced the concepts of "newspeak," "doublethink," and "the mutability of the past," all concepts that seem to be alive and well in 2005, half a century after Orwell's death.
In the ever-changing rationale of why we went to war in Iraq, we can imagine ourselves working in Orwell's "Ministry of Truth," in which "reality control" is used to ensure that "the lie passed into history and became the truth."
And what about the Bush administration's insistence that all is going well in Iraq?
In the Ministry of Truth, statistics are adjustable to suit politics — "merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another," Orwell wrote. "Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connection to anything in the real world, not even the kind of connection that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in the rectified version."
Welcome to the Iraq war, Mr. Orwell.
Rumsfeld's newspeak, or was it doublethink
What of Donald Rumsfeld's newspeak, or was it doublethink, saying that "no detention facility in the history of warfare has been more transparent" than Guantanamo?
We have the FBI's word for it that prisoners were chained hand and foot in a fetal position to the floor, left for 18 to 24 hours with no food and no water, left to defecate and urinate on themselves.
The deaths by torture in Abu Ghraib and Afghanistan sound very much like what happens in Orwell's fictional torture chamber: Room 101.
He might as well have been writing about the Bush administration's redefinition of torture when he wrote about using "logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it."
In Orwell's profoundly pessimistic view: "Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."
There is something profoundly Orwellian, too, about the administration's attempts to impose thought control on public broadcasting. The sometimes secret machinations to place impositions on editorial freedom, the efforts to see which people interviewed by Bill Moyers might be considered anti-Bush or anti-Defense Department or insufficiently conservative, were just the kind of efforts to squash intellectual opposition to state power that Orwell wrote about.
I was amused to see even a conservative Republican senator, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, was branded as a "liberal" because he dared criticize the Pentagon — a "thought criminal" in Orwell's parlance.
The drum beat by some conservatives to bring down an independent judiciary is another case in point. We learned from the case of unfortunate, blind, and brain-dead Terri Schiavo that it isn't activist judges who are the enemy. It is judges who are not active in the correct causes.
It is the intended persecution of Michael Schiavo, who defended his wife's right to die, however, that has for me the most sinister echoes of Orwell.
Florida Governor Jeb Bush, according to news reports, will have the case reopened after 15 years to investigate how long it took Schiavo to dial 911. Thus will Michael Schiavo feel the displeasure of the state for challenging the conservative orthodoxy.
The defense of the indefensible.
In the effort to squash dissent, as evidenced by moves to change the Sentate's filibuster rules, there seems to be the belief among the majority that they will always stay in the majority, that they will never lose the Senate, and, therefore, never themselves need to filibuster.
Orwell had something to say about this too. "Power worship blurs political judgment," he wrote in an essay, "because it leads, almost unavoidably, to the belief that present trends will continue. Whoever is winning at the moment will always seem to be invincible."
There are any number of Guantanamo defenders who could fit neatly into George Orwell's essay when he wrote: "In our time, political speech and writing is largely the defense of the indefensible."
© Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world.
Goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed.
And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare.
The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour.
War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.
Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed.
A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that would build several hundred cargo-ships.
Ultimately it is scrapped as obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built.
In principle the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might exist after meeting the bare needs of the population.
In practice the needs of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life ; but this is looked on as an advantage.
It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another.
      George Orwell 1984      
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Friday, 27 January 2006
US plans to 'fight the net' revealed
Adam Brookes
By Adam Brookes
BBC Pentagon correspondent
Internet cafe in Iraq

A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for 'information operations' — from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.

The document says information is ;critical to military success'
The document says information is ;critical to military success'
A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for "information operations" — from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.
Bloggers beware.
As the world turns networked, the Pentagon is calculating the military opportunities that computer networks, wireless technologies and the modern media offer.
From influencing public opinion through new media to designing "computer network attack" weapons, the US military is learning to fight an electronic war.
The declassified document is called "Information Operations Roadmap".
It was obtained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University using the Freedom of Information Act.
Officials in the Pentagon wrote it in 2003.
The Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, signed it.
The "roadmap" calls for a far-reaching overhaul of the military's ability to conduct information operations and electronic warfare.
And, in some detail, it makes recommendations for how the US armed forces should think about this new, virtual warfare.
The document says that information is "critical to military success".
Computer and telecommunications networks are of vital operational importance.
Propaganda
The operations described in the document include a surprising range of military activities: public affairs officers who brief journalists, psychological operations troops who try to manipulate the thoughts and beliefs of an enemy, computer network attack specialists who seek to destroy enemy networks.
All these are engaged in information operations.
US Defense Secretary at the Pentagon.

A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for 'information operations' — from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.

The wide-reaching document was signed off by Donald Rumsfeld
The wide-reaching document was signed off by Donald Rumsfeld
Perhaps the most startling aspect of the roadmap is its acknowledgement that information put out as part of the military's psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans.
"Information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and Psyops, is increasingly consumed by our domestic audience," it reads.
"Psyops messages will often be replayed by the news media for much larger audiences, including the American public," it goes on.
The document's authors acknowledge that American news media should not unwittingly broadcast military propaganda. "Specific boundaries should be established," they write.
But they don't seem to explain how.
"In this day and age it is impossible to prevent stories that are fed abroad as part of psychological operations propaganda from blowing back into the United States — even though they were directed abroad," says Kristin Adair of the National Security Archive.
Credibility problem
Public awareness of the US military's information operations is low, but it's growing — thanks to some operational clumsiness.
Late last year, it emerged that the Pentagon had paid a private company, the Lincoln Group, to plant hundreds of stories in Iraqi newspapers.
The stories — all supportive of US policy — were written by military personnel and then placed in Iraqi publications.
And websites that appeared to be information sites on the politics of Africa and the Balkans were found to be run by the Pentagon.
But the true extent of the Pentagon's information operations, how they work, who they're aimed at, and at what point they turn from informing the public to influencing populations, is far from clear.
The roadmap, however, gives a flavour of what the US military is up to — and the grand scale on which it's thinking.
When it describes plans for electronic warfare, or EW, the document takes on an extraordinary tone.
It seems to see the internet as being equivalent to an enemy weapons system
It reveals that Psyops personnel "support" the American government's international broadcasting.
It singles out TV Marti - a station which broadcasts to Cuba - as receiving such support.
It recommends that a global website be established that supports America's strategic objectives.
But no American diplomats here, thank you.
The website would use content from "third parties with greater credibility to foreign audiences than US officials".
It also recommends that Psyops personnel should consider a range of technologies to disseminate propaganda in enemy territory: unmanned aerial vehicles, "miniaturized, scatterable public address systems", wireless devices, cellular phones and the internet.
'Fight the net'
When it describes plans for electronic warfare, or EW, the document takes on an extraordinary tone.
It seems to see the internet as being equivalent to an enemy weapons system.
"Strategy should be based on the premise that the Department [of Defense] will 'fight the net' as it would an enemy weapons system," it reads.
The slogan "fight the net" appears several times throughout the roadmap.
The authors warn that US networks are very vulnerable to attack by hackers, enemies seeking to disable them, or spies looking for intelligence.
"Networks are growing faster than we can defend them... Attack sophistication is increasing... Number of events is increasing."
US digital ambition
And, in a grand finale, the document recommends that the United States should seek the ability to "provide maximum control of the entire electromagnetic spectrum".
US forces should be able to "disrupt or destroy the full spectrum of globally emerging communications systems, sensors, and weapons systems dependent on the electromagnetic spectrum".
Consider that for a moment.
The US military seeks the capability to knock out every telephone, every networked computer, every radar system on the planet.
Are these plans the pipe dreams of self-aggrandising bureaucrats? Or are they real?
The fact that the "Information Operations Roadmap" is approved by the Secretary of Defense suggests that these plans are taken very seriously indeed in the Pentagon.
And that the scale and grandeur of the digital revolution is matched only by the US military's ambitions for it.
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
There was, of course, no admission that any change had taken place.
Merely it became known, with extreme suddenness and everywhere at once, that Eastasia and not Eurasia was the enemy.
George Orwell 1984
It seems the Cheney administration's decision to negotiate with the Iraq insurgents actually made the Sunday babbling head shows today.  One of the more teling moments was Rumsfeld's effort to justify the new party line by creating a fresh linguistic distinction between the Sunni insurgents and the foreign terrorists:
"They [contacts] go on all the time,” he added.  “Second, the Iraqis have a sovereign government.  They will decide what their relationships with various elements of insurgents will be.  We facilitate those [relationships] from time to time."
But Mr. Rumsfeld said no negotiations are taking place with hardened terrorist elements belonging to al-Qaida or those, as he put it, "with blood on their hands."
I suspect we'll be hearing a lot more about this crucial distinction in the weeks and months ahead.  Hell, before you know it — depending on how the talks go — Rummy may be referring to them as Sunni "freedom fighters."
But such abrupt shifts in the party line are always jarring — as in Orwell's famous description of Big Brother's security agents frantically ripping down propaganda posters that suddenly had the name of the wrong enemy on them.
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
...The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty.
And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.
      George Orwell 1984      
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
                          To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
twenty
twenty
         America’s False Memories              
Iraq war stories play tricks on the mind
by Anna Salleh
Research on the way people processed media reports about the Iraq war tells us more about how we create our beliefs and memories.
Psychologist Professor Stephan Lewandowsky of the University of Western Australia and team report their study of more than 800 people from Australia, the US and Germany, in the March issue of the journal Psychological Science.
Lewandowsky says the study, which was conducted in 2003 during the closing phases of the war and soon afterwards, was triggered by the number of retractions that occurred in the media at the time.
"It struck us as remarkable how many things were reported and then subsequently corrected," he says.
The first part of their study looked at how people processed corrections that occurred in the early days of the war.
The researchers asked whether people believed statements based on two kinds of press reports: one type that had been retracted and one that continued to be reported as fact.
The four statements based on reports that participants knew had been retracted were:
UK Terror State Blair and Brown
-The allies captured an Iraqi general during the first one to two weeks of the war
-Allied POWs (Prisoners of War) were executed by the Iraqis after being captured and/or surrendering
-Toward the end of the first week of the war, there was a significant civilian uprising against the Iraqi Baath Party militia in Basra, and
-During the first few days of the war, an entire Iraqi division (some 8000 soldiers) was captured and/or surrendered to the allies.
"We tried to be as balanced as possible whether it put the Iraqis in a bad light, or the Coalition forces, to the extent that that was possible," Lewandowsky says.
Sceptics and non-sceptics
The researchers also classified people as sceptical if they disagreed with the official reason given for war, ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).
The results showed there were far fewer sceptics in the US than in Germany and Australia.  And that such sceptics were less likely to believe statements that they knew had been retracted than those people classified as non-sceptical.
"The main finding about suspicion is confirming what we have known for quite a while from laboratory studies," says Lewandowsky.
"People do not discount corrected information unless they are suspicious about it or unless they are given some other hypothesis with which to interpret the information."
He says this has important implications in the judicial system where judges often instruct juries to disregard certain information.
"It turns out that jurors don’t disregard information even if they are directed to do so unless they are being made suspicious about why the information was actually used in the first place.  So, exactly what we found."
False memories
The study also supports certain theories about the formation of false memories, says Lewandowsky.
"The constant hinting at WMDs was sufficient to make some people believe that they have been found," he says.
Lewandowsky says the study confirmed previous findings that around 30% of US respondents say weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq since the war started.
By contrast, he says, only 17% of Australians and only 5% of Germans believe this was the case.
"Given that that is in fact not true, given that none has ever been discovered, we would classify those responses as a false memory," says Lewandowsky.
He can’t explain why this is the case but thinks that scepticism may also play a role.
"Overall, our scientific understanding of human memory reveals it as a device that is prone to considerable error and distortion," says Lewandowsky, referring to other research on the ability of victims to remember perpetrators of a crime.
"Even when they are not being actively manipulated, there is consistent evidence that people often mistakenly identify ’perpetrators’ from a line-up of entirely innocent people."
UK Terror State War Criminals Blair and Brown
http://abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1316359.htm
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but it is morally treasonable to the American public."
President Theodore Roosevelt
"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive.  The People are the only sure reliance for the preservation of liberty.
Thomas Jefferson
"War is a racket...conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the very many...of course it isn’t put that crudely in war time.  It is dressed into speeches about patriotism, love of country, and "we must all put our shoulders to the wheel," but the profits jump and leap and skyrocket and are safely pocketed."
Marine Corps General Smedley Butler
Posted by : the junky scientist, Saturday 12th March 2005
Article written by Anna Salleh, March, 2005
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Kentucky Senator Jim Bunning revealed that he watches only Fox News for information.

California Congressman Chris Cox recently lied to a crowd,
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
 
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
Some are concerned simply with planning the logistics of future wars.
Others devise larger and larger rocket bombs, more and more powerful explosives, and more and more impenetrable armour-plating.
Others search for new and deadlier gases.
Or for soluble poisons capable of being produced in such quantities as to destroy the vegetation of whole continents.
Or for breeds of disease germs immunized against all possible antibodies.
Others strive to produce a vehicle that shall bore its way under the soil like a submarine under the water.
Or an aeroplane as independent of its base as a sailing-ship.
Others explore even remoter possibilities such as focusing the sun's rays through lenses suspended thousands of kilometres away in space.
Or producing artificial earthquakes and tidal waves by tapping the heat at the earth's centre.
      George Orwell 1984 - First Published 1949      
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
NATO's silent toxic air-spraying planes
Chemtrails HAARP and the full spectrum dominance of planet earth.

Image: internet
Climate engineering weather warfare collapse of civilization

Image: internet
“I had a Sunday dinner a few weeks ago at the house of my dad’s and stepmom’s neighbors.
The man and woman of the house are in their 60’s and both proud liberals.
The man said he was a ‘Berkley liberal.’ He supports Hillary, she supports Bernie Sanders.
Towards the end of the dinner he expressed the opinion that a few nuke bombs on some of the major cities in Iraq would be a good idea.
Previous to that, he defended the dropping of nuke bombs on Japan.
The guy’s wife, the Bernie supporter, added something about the barbarous tribal nature of Iraqi society.
She quoted Deepak Chopra on the [evil] nature of Mohamed.
Their son is a fighter pilot who is thinking about joining the top gun program.
He is gay but is too scared to come out to his work colleagues.”
Bi-Polar Disorder: Obama’s Bait-and-Switch Environmental Politics — click here
P.S. from Kewe to the above article written by Paul Street.
I accept the sun is a much greater factor in global weather than human-made activity.
That it is possible climate change will become a bigger problem but also more probable the sun is presently taking us into a mini-cold period.
That the increase in human-made carbon dioxide combined in the stratosphere with other Earth-releasing-of-warmth blocking chemicals is causing a wave of new tree/plant growth in areas not seen for many millennium.
That seeding of the clouds being done by NATO with its toxic compounds is completely destructive to the soil, seas and inland waters beneath, and many vulnerable humans and varied life, and that the politicians responsible for this NATO destructive activity should be held accountable for such as being enemies of Earth's eco-structure and livability.
From the video 'Holes in Heaven' — Brooks Agnew, Earth Tornographer
In 1983 I did radio tornography with 30 watts looking for oil in the ground.
I found 26 oil wells over a nine state area.
100 hundred percent of the time was accurate, which is just 30 watts of power beaming straight into solid rock.
HAARP uses a billion watts beamed straight into the ionosphere for experiments.
Picture these strings on the piano as layers of the Earth, each one has its own frequency.
What we used to do is beam radio waves into the ground and it would vibrate any 'strings' that were present in the ground.
We might get a sound back like ___ and we would say, that's natural gas.
We might get a sound back like ____ and we'd say that's crude oil.
We were able to identify each frequency.
We accomplished this with just 30 watts of radio power.
If you do this with a billion watts the vibrations are so violent that the entire piano would shake.
In fact the whole house would shake.
In fact the vibrations could be so severe under ground they could even cause an earthquake.
Download or watch movie on HAARP — Advanced US Military research weapon on behaviour modification
weather change, ionesphere manipulation — click here
Download or watch audio of Dr. Nick Begich talking on HAARP
— The 2006 update to 'Angels Don't Play This HAARP'.
'Angels Still Don't Play This HAARP: Advances In Tesla Technology'.
Planet Earth Weapon by Rosalie Bertell
ozone, HAARP, chemtrails, space war — click here
What HAARP Is.. And Everything Its Used For
Full HAARP Documentary — click here
Angels Dont Play This HAARP weather manipulation
1 hour 36 minutes video — click here
(poor quality to watch but well worth listening)
Dr. Nick Begich, his book and his articles can be found here
       http://www.earthpulse.com/      
Article on Chemtrails — unusual cloud formations in the US.
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
"We are the priests of power," he said. "God is power.  But at present power is only a word so far as you are concerned.
It is time for you to gather some idea of what power means.
The first thing you must realize is that power is collective.
The individual only has power in so far as he ceases to be an individual.
You know the Party slogan: "Freedom is Slavery".  Has it ever occurred to you that it is reversible?  Slavery is freedom.
Alone — free — the human being is always defeated.
It must be so, because every human being is doomed to die, which is the greatest of all failures.
But if he can make complete, utter submission, if he can escape from his identity, if he can merge himself in the Party so that he is the Party, then he is all-powerful and immortal.
The second thing for you to realize is that power is power over human beings.
Over the body but, above all, over the mind.
Power over matter — external reality, as you would call it — is not important.
Already our control over matter is absolute."
      George Orwell 1984      
1984 - George Orwell.

Television - who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

Really happening now.

Image: internet
PDF and now EPub versions for small tablets and Kindle, Nook and varied e-readers
The Game - The Enslavement Dream - Manor House Oath Highway.

TheWE.cc
The Enslavement Dream
CIA Obama the acting president
Every facial movement, gesture of the hand, word enunciated by the 44th president turns out to be a complete charade
The CIA — Obama — Illuminati
A long-term strategic CIA plan to recruit promising candidates
and steer these individuals and their families into positions of influence and power
Behavior modification
Phenomenological — structures of consciousness — programs
US policy has even less regard for human rights both abroad and at home
Afghanistan Present

Ludicrous Diversion - 7/7 London Bombings Documentary

On the 7th of July 2005 London was hit by a series of explosions.
There were calls for an impartial inquiry which have been rejected by the British Labour govenment.
Tony Blair described such an inquiry as a ‘ludicrous diversion’.
What don’t they want us to find out?
You probably think you know what happened that day.
But you don’t.
      U.S. doctors linked to POW `torture'     
      They took a scalpel to my right chest     
      CIA MI6 — Penis cut       
      Guantanamo Hunger Strikers being tortured        
        Torture and America         
       Torture by US doctors, medics, psychologists and military personnel         
1984 — the movie
1984 — produced in 1954 movie
Unspeakable grief and horror
                        ...and the circus of deception continues...
He says, "You are quite mad, Kewe"
And of course I am.
Why, I don't believe any of it — not the bloody body, not the bloody mind, not even the bloody Universe, or is it bloody multiverse.
"It's all illusion," I say.   "Don't you know, my lad, my lassie.   The game!   The game, me girl, me boy!   Takes on interest, don't you know.   T'is me sport, till doest find a better!"
Pssssst — but all this stuff is happening down here
Let's change it!
To say hello:     hello[the at marker]TheWE.cc
For Kewe's spiritual and metaphysical pages — click here