War Criminals since they voted to help kill, along with the U.S. killers, a million children by bombing and depriving of food in the 90's
Then in 2003 voting to kill another million people in Iraq
UK DYSTOPIAN COUNTRY

DEMOCRACY

Parliament War Criminals since they voted to kill a million people in Iraq.

Picture: Internet
UK DYSTOPIAN COUNTRY
THIS IS DEMOCRACY
Criminalization of Parliamentary Democracy
December 12, 2015
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
UK War Crimes.

Principal Neremberg Trial - punishable as crimes under international law: 

crimes against peace

1. planning preparation initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements, or assurances

2. participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under 1

Picture:  interet
Responsibility for war crimes committed against Syria no longer rests solely with Her Majesty’s government: A criminal act of war endorsed by the legislature ultimately signifies the de facto criminalization of parliamentary democracy.
Each and every member of parliament who voted in favor of the bombing raids is a war criminal under international law.
Creations of Western intelligence
Syria is being bombed as part of a “counter-terrorism campaign” allegedly against the Islamic State, an elusive “outside enemy” based in Raqqa, Northern Syria.
While the ISIL is said to be “threatening the Western World”, the evidence confirms that the Islamic State is supported and financed by the Western military alliance, together with Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states.
Amply documented, Al Qaeda and its various affiliates including the Islamic State Caliphate Project are creations of Western intelligence.
Moreover, whatever the justification, the bombing of a sovereign country is an illegal and criminal act under international law.
It constitutes a war of aggression, namely a crime against the peace under Nuremberg (Principle VI):
Illegal act under Article 2, paragraph 4 of UN Charter
It is also defined as an illegal act under Article 2, paragraph 4 of the UN Charter:
“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”
Cannot be overridden
What is important to underscore is that neither Nuremberg Principle VI, nor Article 2 of the UN Charter can be overridden by an ad hoc resolution of the United Nations Security Council put forth by one or more permanent members of the Security Council (e.g. UNSC Resolution 2249) with a view to justifying an act of military aggression.
“Self Defense”
In bombing Syria, the Western military alliance claims the right to “self-defense”: our countries are “being attacked from abroad”.
An alleged ISIL terrorist attack, however, is not tantamount to “an act of war” by a foreign power as defined under international law.
Ironically, this fake pretext of “self defense” invoked by several EU member states, was claimed by the French government two months prior to the Paris November 13th terrorist attack.
In the words of France’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius …
”Due to this threat [ISIL] we decided to start reconnaissance flights to have the option for airstrikes, if that would be necessary.
This is self-defense.” (quoted by RT, September 23, 2015)
US, France, Britain are aggressor nations in Syria
The US, France, Britain are the aggressor nations against Syria.
They cannot under any circumstances invoke the Right of Self-defense.
In contrast, Syria is the victim of foreign aggression and has the Right to Self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter which states that:
“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of collective or individual self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations.”
Each and every member of parliament who voted in favor of the bombing raids is a war criminal under international law
Britain’s Cameron government has sought to justify an outright act of war by seeking the endorsement of the House of Commons.
The justification to wage war on Syria is a Big Lie, it borders on the absurd.
Prime Minister Cameron claims that the ISIL plots “to kill the British People” are decided in Raqqa, Northern Syria by an entity which just so happens to be supported (covertly) by the US, NATO, not to mention Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
Endorsement of an illegal and criminal act of war by a majority parliamentary vote in the British House of Commons does not in any way “make it legal” to bomb Syria.
Whatever the pretext, a war of aggression cannot be upheld as an instrument of peacemaking and democracy.
A criminal act endorsed by a democratically elected legislature remains a criminal act.
Nonetheless, what should be emphasized is that the parliamentary vote in favour of Cameron’s motion modifies the criminal nature of the decision-making process.
Responsibility for war crimes committed against Syria no longer rests solely with Her Majesty’s government: A criminal act of war endorsed by the legislature ultimately signifies the de facto criminalization of parliamentary democracy.
Each and every member of parliament who voted in favor of the bombing raids is a war criminal under international law.
This is a modification of article on intifada-palestine.com
For article on intifada-palestine.com:
click here
©2015 Intifada Palestine
World of people not world controlled by bankers
The proposal, which resembles Islamic interest-free banking models in many respects, was first unveiled in December 2014 at the depth of the Ruble crisis and oil price free-fall.
This August the idea received a huge boost from the endorsement of the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
It could change history for the better depending on what is done and where it further leads.
Interest Free Banking: Russia Debates Unorthodox Orthodox Financial Alternative
globalresearch.ca    click here
Here’s the crucial thing. The Turkish F-16s loitered over that mountainous area for about an hour and fifteen minutes.
They were not loitering up at high altitude — say twenty to thirty thousand feet — to conserve fuel, which is where you would normally be loitering if you were simply doing a routine border patrol.
They were loitering quite low, at about seven thousand five hundred to eight thousand feet, which is below the coverage of the Syrian and Russian radars that were down around Latakia, and which is a very fuel-inefficient altitude to loiter.
You suck up a lot of gas down at those low altitudes.
Such an ambush wouldn’t have been hard to pull off, because the Russians, in their detailed account of this, state very clearly that they had coordinated with NATO, with the Americans, announcing this attack well in advance, and had followed the protocol of listening on the NATO-agreed frequency for any warnings or alerts from NATO or from the Turks.
There was plenty of time for the Americans to inform the Turks that this mission was taking place.
Renowned American Military Expert Explains How Turkey Ambushed Russia’s Su-24.
Assisted by US military NATO?
intifada-palestine.com    click here
"... Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.
And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley
"The Technocratic Age is slowly designing an every day more controlled society.
The society will be dominated by an elite of persons free from traditional values who will have no doubt in fulfilling their objectives by means of purged techniques with which they will influence the behavior of people and will control and watch the society in all details."
"... it will become possible to exert a practically permanent watch on each citizen of the world."
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Illuminati member and co-founder of Trilateral Commission
A very interesting Corbett report on the Oklahoma City bombing.
April 19, 1995, the Alfred P. Murrah Building was torn apart by explosions, killing 168. Office workers! Passersby! Children in the building’s day care centre! Horrified, a nation in grief turned to the authorities for answers.
The “face of American terrorism”
The Secret Life of Timothy McVeigh
You get this and you get 911 and 7/7 and most of the bombings since.
Kewe
corbettreport.com   click here
Corbett Report 305 — Secret life of Timothy McVeigh
download mp3 — spread it around
thewe.cc server    right click save target as
A Noble Lie: The Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995
youtube.com   click here
David Icke — Fear of Death originates in ignorance of life
download mp3 — spread it around
thewe.cc server    right click save target as
ACT OF AGGRESSION
Certainly the U.S. and Cameron and now the UK Parliament have been begging for war.
They know the house of cards they have as a financial structure is likely to topple any moment!
Those who control the world will have it on their terms or they will not have a world of people!
We will have to see what happens!
Kewe
Western coalition strikes Syrian army camp, 3 dead, 13 injured
rt.com    click here
Unspeakable grief and horror
                        ...and the circus of deception continues...
— 2017
— 2016
— 2015
— 2014
— 2013
— 2012
— 2011
— 2010
— 2009
— 2008
— 2007
— 2006
— 2005
— 2004
— 2003
Circus of Torture   2003 — now
PDF and now EPub versions for small tablets and Kindle, Nook and varied e-readers
The Game - The Enslavement Dream - Manor House Oath Highway.

TheWE.cc
 Kewe ArchivesNews you might have missedTheWE.cc index pageThe Planet