Get the picture
Europe Conspiracy continues
Kickstarting World War III Hague Fabius Kerry hoping we won't complain
Taking back our power and our lives
Europe conspiracy Holland should not hold power
One does expect someone as elevated to the position in which Holland has been placed to have some reasoning, some background intelligence, that his reasoning is not gathered from just from one source, that may be false.
The U.S. has an agenda with their financing of the terrorists doing their best to destroy the country of Syria.
Where is the President of France hoping to position himself if those who are now being financed and weaponised to take the Syria state, succeed, help being given unwillingly by the French taxpayer?
If humankind is to survive on this planet, given that we are now able to kill all of ourselves in one go, we quickly must start to establish a new arrangement where representative government holds less and less power, and people vote themselves on individual issues.
Ah! you say, can we trust the people to make wise decisions?
In the West, do we have any politicians making any 'wise' decisions?
Let's look at the state we are in: our slavery employment when one can get it youth and their hopes?
Everything cries out for leadership while the politicians we have elected devote their time to furthering injury and death!
Shouldn't we get back to making things
Shouldn't we get back to actually making things in the West?
Give employment back to the young who want to make something for their future?
It's not that we can do so much better it's that we have no choice!
And that means getting rid of the slavery system presently holding power taking back our power, and our lives!
Ban on PressTV all cable & satellite TV US UK Europe
US fails to respond to Iran warnings of Takfiris chemical weapons in Syria
Get the picture
Obama not happy he cannot kill more people
Obama says world's credibility is on line if we don't go and kill a bunch of people in Syria
Nanci Pelosi ready for war with Syria
Syria inaction alarming says William Hague hoping to kill more people in Syria
Riskier not to strike Syria says Kerry hoping to kill and injure more people in Syria
Syria crossed global red line says Kerry hoping to kill and injure more people in Syria
G20 split as Obama wants to kill and injure more people in Syria
America must prevent other states:
"From challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order...
We must maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role."
Pentagon Planning Guide for 1994-1999
Obama pushes for support for military strike to kill and injure people in Syria
Tony Blair wants killing and injuring in Syria
US has new chemical evidence says Cameron seeking to kill and injure in Syria
UK to keep pushing on Syria Hague seeking to kill and injure
Kerry seeking to kill and injure has evidence of sarin gas.
Syria attack killed 1429 people says Kerry seeking to kill more and injure more
No one knows where he got that figure?
Colin Powell United States representative at the United Nations Security Council
Holding up a vial containing a supposed biological weapon
Fabricating evidence February 5, 2003
|Syria President al-Assad interview with Rossiya September 13, 2013
Friday Sep 13, 2013
Rossiya: Why did Syria agree to the Russian initiative which proposes handing over its chemical weapons to the international community? Why so rapidly?
President al-Assad: Over 10 years ago, Syria presented the UN with a proposal for a WMD-Free Middle East; this was because the region is turbulent and has been immersed in wars for decades.
Thus removing unconventional weapons would be rational in order to enhance stability, at that particular time the U.S hindered the proposal.
Firstly, in principle we strive for peace and stability therefore we do not perceive the existence of WMD’s in the Middle East to have any positive effect.
Secondly, in relation to current developments, Syria as a state genuinely seeks to avert another war of lunacy on itself and countries in the region, contrary to the efforts of warmongers in the U.S who seek to inflame a regional war.
We continue to pay the price of U.S wars, be it in geographically distant Afghanistan or neighbouring Iraq.
We believe that a war on Syria shall be destructive to the region and embroil it in a quagmire of instability for decades or generations to come.
Thirdly, and most remarkably, what was most encouraging was the Russian initiative itself, without which we would not have been able to pursue this path.
Our relations with Russia are founded on trust which grew during the crisis throughout the last two and a half years.
The fact that Russia has proven itself to have an insight into events in the region with high credibility as a reliable major power encouraged Syria to work towards signing the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Without Russian initiative chemical weapons matter would not have been deliberated with any other country
Rossiya: For example, the American President Barack Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry stated that Syria’s acceptance of the Russian initiative to place the chemical weapons under international observation only derived from a threat of missile strikes. Is this true?
President al-Assad: This is American propaganda; Kerry, Obama and the American administration seek to appear victorious, as if their threats yielded success.
This is insignificant to us; what matters is for the decision to be based on Syria’s convictions and a significant Russian role.
Only weeks ago, the American threats of a military strike were not for disarming Syria of WMDs, but based on American allegations regarding the use of chemical weapons.
The Americans began to mention this not before, but after the G20 summit.
Furthermore the main catalyst in this move was the Russian initiative alongside our discussions with Russian officials.
Without the Russian initiative, the matter would not have been deliberated with any other country.
Syria to send letters to the UN and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons with the technical records necessary to sign the convention
Rossiya: Yesterday, statements circulated that Russia presented the US a plan for fulfilling the initiative on international control of Syrian chemical weapons.
Would Your Excellency please explain what was discussed in terms of proposed steps?
President al-Assad: Over the forthcoming days, Syria shall send letters to the UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons with the technical records necessary to sign the convention.
Subsequently, work shall commence to sign the anti-chemical weapons convention which prohibits its production, storage or usage.
I believe the agreement will come into effect a month after signing it and Syria will start submitting data regarding its chemical weapons stockpile to international organizations.
When we proposed a project on the elimination of WMDs in the region, the US opposed it
These are standard procedures which we shall adhere to, however it does not mean that Syria will sign the documents, fulfil the obligations and that’s it.
It is a bilateral process aimed principally at making the US cease pursuing its policy of aggression against Syria and proceed in compliance with the Russian initiative.
When we see the US genuinely working towards stability in the region and stop threatening, striving to attack, and delivering arms to terrorists then we will believe that the necessary processes can be finalised.
From a Syrian perspective, we perceive that this is achievable and can be implemented; however this is not a single-track process.
The only country capable of undertaking this role is Russia, due to the absence of trust and contact between us and the Americans.
Rossiya: Were the initiative to be implemented, which international body would the Syrian Arab Republic favour as the Organisation to control the chemical weapons?
The situation in Syria is hardly ordinary.
President al-Assad: We believe that the logical and appropriate body is the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
It is the only organisation that has the capability and experts which oversaw the implementation of this convention in all countries.
When we proposed a project on the elimination of WMDs in the region, the US opposed it
US opposed it to allow Israel to possess such weapons
Rossiya: We all comprehend that Israel signed but has never ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Will Syria demand that Israel fulfils this requirement?
President al-Assad: When we proposed a project on the elimination of WMDs in the region, the US opposed it; one of the reasons was to allow Israel to possess such weapons.
If we desire stability in the Middle East, all countries in the region should adhere to these agreements, and Israel is the first that should do so, since Israel has nuclear, chemical, biological and other types of weapons of mass destruction.
No country should possess weapons of mass destruction.
That would protect the region and the world from devastating and expensive wars in future.
Rossiya: Syria will hand over its chemical weapons to international control; however we all know that Russian experts confirmed the use of poisonous chemical substances in Aleppo suburbs by an extremist terrorist group, what is your take on this?
What do you suggest to protect Syrians and neighbouring countries from these groups that may launch chemical attacks?
President al-Assad: The incident you cited was in March 2013 when the terrorists launched missiles carrying poisonous chemical materials on civilians in Khan al-Asal near Aleppo and tens were killed.
Subsequently, we requested the UN to send a commission of experts to confirm and document what occurred in order to subsequently determine the identity of those responsible for the attack.
As it was obvious that the terrorists were responsible, the US hindered the deployment of the commission to Syria.
Therefore, alongside the Russian experts, we submitted all the details and indications to Russia.
The evidence confirmed that the attack was perpetrated by the terrorists in Northern Syria.
The delegation of experts on chemical weapons who were in Syria a week ago are yet to return to implement the agreement we signed with them during their last visit, which stipulates inspecting a number of areas of which was Khan al-Asal was amongst the top.
This must be carefully investigated to determine the nature of the materials used, who used them and most importantly which countries provided these poisonous materials to the terrorists and subsequently to hold them accountable.
Depends on which countries are connected to the terrorists
Rossiya: Mr President, is it possible to confiscate these poisonous materials from the terrorists?
Is this feasible?
President al-Assad: This ultimately depends on which countries are connected to the terrorists.
All countries claim that they do not cooperate with terrorists, yet we know for certain that the West provides them with logistical support, claiming that it is a non-lethal military support or humanitarian aid.
However, the reality is that the West and particular countries in the region, including Turkey and Saudi Arabia, maintain direct contact with the terrorists and supply them with all measure of arms.
We believe that one of these countries has supplied the terrorists with chemical weapons.
One would assume that these states can cease supplying the terrorists with such weapons; nevertheless there are terrorists who would never comply.
When they have arms and the opportunity to inflict havoc, they would never submit, even to those who provided them with weapons and money.
American propaganda to justify aggression chemical weapons was never discussed in Syria by any party chemical weapons centralised and not at the disposal of the troops
Rossiya: Mr President, certain American media outlets reported that officers in the Syrian Arab Army on several occasions asked for your permission to use chemical weapons in fighting the armed opposition, you did not approve, however they used these poisonous weapons independently.
Is this credible?
President al-Assad: This is a part of American propaganda which spares no effort to justify aggression.
This reminds us of the actions of Collin Powell under George W Bush’s administration ten years ago, when he presented what was claimed as evidence of Saddam Hussein’s possession of WMD’s which was later proven to be false.
They are now repeating similar lies; what you quoted amounts to that.
The reality is that, firstly, approving the use of chemical weapons was never discussed in Syria by any party.
Secondly, the use of such weapons in different countries remains centralised and not at the disposal of the troops.
No infantry or armoured divisions would have such armaments.
These armaments are used by specialised units.
Therefore these lies are neither logical nor credible.
The American administration is in difficult position domestically, they were less skilful than Bush’s administration in circulating their lies
US failed to produce any evidence of video, not to Congress or media
Rossiya: Mr President, very recently, the Congress was presented with what was pronounced as credible and indisputable evidence.
There was video proof to prove the American narrative that chemical weapons were used in Eastern Ghouta by the Syrian Army. What is your opinion on this?
President al-Assad: They failed to produce any evidence, not to Congress or the media; hence they did not present any proof to their own people or even to Russia with whom they are currently holding talks or any other country for that matter.
It is just mere talk and an extension of American propaganda. Logically it is not conceivable to use WMD’s only hundreds of metres away from your own troops.
Those weapons cannot be deployed in residential areas since they would kill tens of thousands; nor when you are making major advances using conventional weapons.
The rhetoric used was unconvincing which placed this American administration in a difficult position domestically. This administration could not even persuade its own allies of its lies.
Therefore these allegations bear no value; they are unrealistic and un-credible.
Certain countries are supplying chemical materials to terrorist groups
Rossiya: Mr President, the last question which I cannot spare since it concerns wider general safety and security.
There are Russian specialists and media outlets who reported that terrorists may prepare for chemical attacks against Israel from government controlled areas.
As commander in chief do you confirm this information?
President al-Assad: Firstly, since it is certain that chemical materials are owned by terrorist groups and were used against our soldiers and civilians; this denotes that these materials are readily available.
Secondly, we comprehend that these terrorist groups, or those who mobilise them, were seeking to provoke an American strike and, prior to that, they had attempted to involve Israel in the Syrian crisis.
For these reasons your proposition is not unlikely.
A regional war would create more chaos which would enable these terrorist groups to inflict more destruction and sabotage.
This is a genuine challenge since the terrorists do possess these chemical materials and certain countries are supplying them.
For translations in French and Spanish click here
Russian Pyotr Veliky Peter the Great heavy nuclear-powered cruiser
Russia is to expand it's Mediterranean fleet to 10 warships.
“This group will take part in international exercises of the naval forces of the countries of the Asia-Pacific region and later will take part in the centenary celebration of the Australian Navy,” said Russian Commander Admiral Viktor Chirkov.
“In time of peace the Russian Navy’s duty and main application is military service, constant naval presence in the zones of military-political tension where interests of the Russian Federation are concentrated.
For the first time ever all Russia’s nuclear surface ships heavy nuclear missile cruiser Pyotr Veliky and nuclear icebreakers Yamal, Vaigach, Taimyr, and '50 Let Pobedy' are combined to perform a joined task.”
The U.S. won't stop unless it is stopped
A Syrian nun lights candles inside the historical church of Mar Taqla in the village of Maaloula north of Damascus
Maaloula Syria is one of few places in the world where people still speak Aramaic biblical-era language that Jesus used
Saba Ubeid, a store owner who has chosen to join the Army to defend his village cries out.
“They sent terrorists here from all corners of the world to kill Syrian people and each other.
I ask the world, why?
While in Europe if a citizen is simply slapped in his face, there'll be a scandal.
While Syrians how many victims, how many hundreds of thousands have been slaughtered?
When it will stop?”
|Ridiculousness of Obama on television
September 10 2013
Noam Chomsky on the words spoken by Obama on television, September 10, 2013:
It was kind of interesting what he didn’t say.
This would be a perfect opportunity to ban chemical weapons, to impose the chemical weapons convention on the Middle East.
The convention, contrary to what Obama said, does not specifically refer just to use of chemical weapons; it refers to production, storage or use of chemical weapons.
That’s banned by the international norm that Obama likes to preach about.
Well, there is a country which happens to have illegally annexed part of Syrian territory, which has chemical weapons and is in violation of the chemical weapons convention and has refused even to ratify it namely, Israel.
So here’s an opportunity to eliminate chemical weapons from the region, to impose the chemical weapons convention as it’s actually formulated.
But Obama was very careful not to say that he for reasons which are too obvious to go into and that gap is highly significant.
Of course, chemical weapons should be eliminated everywhere, but certainly in that region.
The other things that he said were not unusual, but nevertheless kind of shocking to anyone not familiar with U.S. political discourse, at least.
He said that for seven decades the United States has been 'the anchor of global security.'
That includes, for example, just 40 years ago today, when the United States played a major role in overthrowing the parliamentary democracy of Chile and imposing a brutal dictatorship, called 'the first 9/11' in Latin America.
Go back earlier years, overthrowing the parliamentary system in Iran, imposing a dictatorship.
Same in Guatemala a year later.
Attacking Indochina, the worst crime in the postwar period, killing millions of people.
Attacking Central America.
Killing involved in killing in imposing a dictatorship in the Congo.
Invading Iraq on and on.
I mean, that a Harvard Law School graduate can pronounce those words is pretty amazing, as is the fact that they’re accepted without comment.
So what he said is: 'I’m going to lie like a trooper about history. I’m going to suppress the U.S. role, the actual U.S. role, [I'm going to lie about the U.S. role in killing and injuring, the actual U.S. role in killing and injuring Kewe] for the last seven decades.
I’m going to maintain the threat of force, which is of course illegal.
And I’m going to ensure that the chemical weapons convention is not imposed on the region, because our ally, Israel, would be subjected to it. Placing so much power in the hands of one or even many persons is very dangerous for the planet!
For humankind to survive, this does have to be changed!
Some hopeful progressives still say, "Obama has to bob and weave, while positioning himself at the high table as the people's champion."
The Empire relishes such servants
If Only They'd Hissed Barack Obama April 7, 2006 ALEXANDER COCKBURN
|Supports more death |
Illinois Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate position, Barack Obama, is surrounded by reporters after saying he would be willing to send more soldiers to Iraq.
Saturday, September 18, 2004, in Springfield, Illinois
US fabrications of Syria government chemical attack and 9/11
Chemical weapons usage in Syria and the U.S government response looks as if it is going the way of the 911 debacle where fabrication by the U.S government became the norm.
Those people who wish to see the U.S. government handling of these operations in a good light will do so, and will ignore overwhelming evidence that opposes such a viewpoint.
It is more than well documented that the towers were blown up.
But by whom? An Israel - U.S. cabal? An Israel - U.S intelligence cabal? Some terrorist grouping that held and still holds power within U.S. governement circles? The intent being to bring about that which we have seen since 9/11
Throwing out the U.S. fabricated story of 911 and accepting a conspiracy did take place within U.S. government circles prior, during, and after 911, is still difficult for many.
In the links below there is help:
In fact someone told me recently, 'I wouldn't believe what you are telling me even if it were true.'
US fabrications of Syria government chemical attack and 9/11
“Footage and photos of the alleged chemical attack in Syria, which the US cites as the reason for a planned military intervention, had been fabricated in advance, speakers told a UN human rights conference in Geneva.
Members of the conference were presented accounts of international experts, Syrian public figures and Russian news reporters covering the Syrian conflict.”
The RT article goes nowhere that it has not been before. Nothing in the article gives any evidence, much like the U.S giving no evidence.
However it is included here for those who still believe the U.S. fabrication:
September 7, 2013
Rep. Amash: ‘If Americans Could Read Classified Docs, They’d Be Even More Against Syria Action’
Congressman Justin Amash (R-MI) has been a very outspoken opponent of any military intervention in Syria.
He has been all over the media warning that we as a nation should not strike Syria, and he has even used social media sites to warn his fellow Congress members that if they vote for military action next week, they might as well clean out their desks because of unprecedented public opposition against it.
Now Rep. Amash has taken to Twitter to inform the American people of classified documents touted by the White House to justify strikes in Syria.
An admission that he was even more skeptical following another Syria briefing.
Rep. Amash was also vocal regarding the fact that many members of Congress were never briefed on the NSA’s surveillance programs that ignore the Constitution by collecting data on every single American citizen.
Last summer Rep. Amash introduced an amendment that would have prevented the NSA from collecting data on Americans who are not currently under investigation, but it lost by a sorry 12 votes in the House, 205-217.
All the evidence indicates that Obama is not going to get Congressional approval for any military action against Syria during the vote next week.
The president and his administration have been mum about what they will do in the event Congress votes against Syrian intervention.
Obama has already said he does not believe he needs any Congressional approval to bomb Syria.
click here for this article with links
Another very good reason to get rid of the Europe Conspiracy
Europe Conspiracy French Foreign Affairs Minister Laurent Fabius and US Secretary of State John Kerry give a press conference at the ministry in Paris on September 7 2013
"Information from a wide variety of sources seems to indicate strong evidence that the Syrian regime is responsible for this attack."
EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton statement following meeting between European foreign ministers and US Secretary of State John Kerry in the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius on Saturday.
From the UK arm, via Lithuania !
Do these conspiracists get to be more Bedlamatic !
Poll: Majority Of Americans Approve Of Sending US Congress To Syria
A majority of U.S. citizens believe congressional leaders in both the House and Senate must be sent to war-torn Syria immediately
“I believe it is in the best interest of the United States, and the global community as a whole, to move forward with the deployment of all U.S. congressional leaders to Syria immediately,” respondent Carol Abare, 50, said in the nationwide telephone survey, echoing the thoughts of an estimated 9 in 10 Americans who said they 'strongly support' any plan of action that involves putting the U.S. House and Senate on the ground in the war-torn Middle Eastern state.
“With violence intensifying every day, now is absolutely the right moment the perfect moment really for the United States to send our legislators to the region.”
“There’s no doubt in my mind that sending Congress to Syria or at the very least sending the major congressional leaders in both parties is the correct course of action,” survey respondent and Iraq war veteran Maj. Gen. John Mill said, noting that his opinion was informed by four tours of duty in which he saw dozens of close friends sustain physical as well as emotional injury and post-traumatic stress.
“There is a clear solution to our problems staring us right in the face here, and we need to take action.”
“Sooner rather than later, too,” Mill added. “This war isn’t going to last forever.”
The hysteria of Obama and Kerry would be comical were it not so extremely serious.
There is a psychosis here in the petulance being shown at not getting their own way.
Especially when the getting of their own way means killing and injuring a lot of people.
Injuring even slightly one person is one person too many.
As for Cameron in his petulance at a supposed slur by Russia his bringing mention of a boy band 'One Direction's Comic Relief' a band that has added him to one of its videos, cameos outside 10 Downing Street, only adds to this sense of unrealness that Cameron, Obama, Kerry are showing one accepts the continuing idiocy of people like Biden, McCain and Lindsey Graham as standard but nevertheless dangerous buffoons in American culture.
That both Cameron and Obama, if they were sane, would be doing something to assist the quarter of those under 30 who cannot find employment, cannot afford to live away from their parent's home, is something we should expect.
The number of college graduates applying for jobs at McDonald's and shop assistant positions in both countries has reached terrifying proportions, especially with the unsupportable college debt that now hangs upon the young of each of these countries.
One accepts that the debts of the UK and US will never be repaid debts accumulated by constant war. Unfortunately that does not apply to these young people who will lose a portion of their life to worry, unnecessary worry forced upon them by a culture and practice of extreme selfishness by the elite an insistence that the rich loose nothing and continue to get richer if we, the people in these two countries, the ultimate authority, allow this insanity to continue.
Obama and Cameron in their psychosis continue to ignore all this, struggle to make something of the completely false data they have, and know they have, about Syria, about Assad. Struggle to bring about more killing.
Whether both the British and American people will open their eyes finally to this reality of horror that has engaged these two counties in such brutality and lust for killing for so many decades, and one might say in many situations, centuries, in the instance of the British island, millenia, is something we can only speculate upon.
Whether the sickness better termed psychosis in the practices of these two countries will at last be stopped by its citizens, remains to be seen.
Dozen former U.S. military and intelligence officials telling President Obama they are picking up information that undercuts official U.S. story on Syria chemical weapons
“We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this.
Our sources confirm that a chemical incident of some sort did cause fatalities and injuries on August 21 in a suburb of Damascus.
They insist, however, that the incident was not the result of an attack by the Syrian Army using military-grade chemical weapons from its arsenal.
That is the most salient fact, according to CIA officers working on the Syria issue.
They tell us that CIA Director John Brennan is perpetrating a pre-Iraq-War-type fraud on members of Congress, the media, the public and perhaps even you.”
“The European race’s last |three four hundred years of evolutionary progress have all come down to nothing but four words: