For archive purposes, this article is being stored on TheWE.cc website.
The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.

 
Friday, Oct. 13, 2003.
— Circus Maximus
By Chris Floyd
Arnold Schwarzenegge governor - Involvement with Bush-backing Enron chief Ken Lay
The hackneyed phrase "political circus" came vividly to life on the shores of the Pacific this month.   The national media, hardly sober and substantive in the best of times, was postively drunk with tabloid glee over two lurid spectacles whose simultaneous explosions of sex, blood, celebrity and raw power merged into a single glop of fevered emotionalism, driving the real story deep into the shadows.

We refer, of course, to the elevation of a cartoonish muscle-man to high office and the near-devouring of a Las Vegas circus performer by a white tiger.   In the garish cacophony of America's 24-7 media bubble, the election of scandal-plagued Arnold Schwarznegger to the governorship of California was scarcely differentiated from the mauling of Vegas showman Roy Horn during his animal act at the aptly-named Mirage Hotel.   Both stories were the subject of non-stop gabbling on every news outlet, with the American media's high priest, CNN's Larry King, alternating interviews with California political players and Vegas heavyweights on the implications of it all.

Politics, tigers, governments, movies: it's all one thing, one product in America's mega-merged media these days.   Diversion is the name of the game: keep 'em stirred up, with witless tittilation, primitive emotion, gossip, chatter, anxiety   ("Are your taxes going up?   Is your deodorant letting you down?   Are the terrorists gonna get you?   Does your butt look big in this?" )  — endlessly evoking unfufillable desires for beauty, riches, security, love.   Reality gets smothered in the glop.

The rightwing money-men behind the Schwarzenegger sideshow are well aware of this new paradigm.   They were no doubt delighted when the stories about Arnold's aggressively roving hands hit the papers the weekend before the vote (at the same time Horn's tiger lit up the airwaves with his bloodwork).   The meticulously detailed allegations of the actor's boorish mauling of women over the past quarter-century provided the perfect opportunity to shovel the election into the diversionary ditch of personal scandal, with its ritual patterns of charge, denial, contrition and counterattack.   It wasn't likely that louche behavior from a Hollywood actor would come as a great shock to anyone already enthralled by celebrity — including stalwart Republican conservatives, like prim Mormon politico Orrin Hatch, who had rained hellfire on Bill Clinton for consensual dalliances, but leapt to defend Arnold for his "youthful indiscretions."   (In fact, Hatch went so far as to introduce legislation to lift the Constitutional ban on foreign-born citizens — like Austrian native Schwarzenegger — running for president.   Next stop: Das Weisse Haus, baby.)

All this non-signifying sound and fury kept voter — and media — attention away from the real impetus behind the recall.   As always, it comes down to big money.   The same weekend that sex charges and circus blood flooded the news, muckracker extraordinaire Greg Palast produced the smoking gun: reams of corporate memos that confirmed Schwarzenegger's involvement with Bush-backing Enron chief Ken Lay and convicted stock swindler Mike Milken in a scheme to thwart the California government's attempt to win back $9 billion in illegal profits looted by Lay and his fellow energy barons during the state's manufactured "energy crisis" in 2000.

Taking advantage of the state's Republican-installed, loophole-ridden "deregulation" laws, Lay and the barons gamed the energy grid in 1999-2000, forcing massive blackouts and monstrous price hikes, and costing California more than $70 billion, as Jason Leopold reports in Scoop.   After hard evidence of widespread tampering and manipulation came to light, the state government of Governor Gray Davis filed a $9 billion civil suit against Lay and the boys to recover some of those ill-gotten gains.

It was then that Arnie sat down with "Kenny Boy" (the cutesy nickname George W. Bush gave to his biggest contributor) and Conman Mike in L.A.'s swank Peninsula Hotel to launch their plunder protection plan.   Kenny Boy would work on the Washington energy regulators — whose chief had been appointed by Bush on Lay's personal recommendation — to reduce any federal penalties to peanuts.   The moguls would then use Arnold's boundless ambition for power (his admiration for dictators was as well-documented as his girl-groping) to take over the state government and put the kibosh on the private lawsuit.

Here's the crux: the main charge against Davis in the recall was that his inept leadership had led to an $8 billion budget deficit.   (Actually, Arnie — and the national media — continually repeated the falsehood that the state had a $38 billion deficit.   But who cares?   Hey, did you hear about that tiger?)   Yet a Schwarzenegger win meant throwing away $9 billion — leaving it in the pockets of Kenny Boy and his fellow Bush bagmen.

But Palast's story didn't stand a chance against Vegas tigers, Kennedy wives, kinky sex and celebrity glitz.   Nor, as Leopold points out, did the bedazzled media bother to visit Arnold's own website, where he — or rather, his advisers like Ken Lay — clearly laid out the Recaller's rapacious energy policy: a return to Enron-friendly deregulation and the gutting of state programs to build small, publicly-owned power plants to ward off future blackouts.

So Arnold was swept in — and the deficit-clearing lawsuit was, of course, swept out.   Immediately after the election, a Schwarzenegger spokesman said the new governor would not pursue the court action: "It's time to settle and move on."

Indeed.   For Arnold has also pledged to eliminate public oversight on any future state contracts with his baronial energy backers.   In other words, the tigers have been set loose again — and California's hapless, misinformed, media-cheated citizens are in for another fierce mauling.







December 21, 2003
— Bush's Iraq Project is Right on Course: Saddam 2.0
By Chris Floyd


One of the constant refrains we hear from the malcontents carping about George W. Bush’s triumphant crusade in Iraq is the charge — the canard — that the president and his crack team of advisers “had no plan” for the post-war period, that they’ve stumbled from crisis to crisis, changing policies without rhyme or reason, or have even “plunged off a cliff,” as erstwhile war-hawk Newt Gingrich declared last week.

But to anyone not blinded by partisan ideology or irrational Bush-hatred, the evidence clearly shows that Team Bush has always had a very specific plan for remaking Iraq — and is following it faithfully to this very day.

Of course, it’s not always easy to discern the president’s steadfast adherence to principle through the defeatist fog of the liberal American media.   For instance, this month saw perhaps the most significant progress yet toward the fulfillment of Bush’s master plan, yet there was not a word about it anywhere in America’s media “Establishment.”   No, Britain’s Financial Times and South Africa’s Sunday Times provided the unvarnished truth last week.

We refer, of course, to the $40 million contract awarded by occupation authorities to a private security company called Erinys Iraq.   This plucky start-up is one of the great success stories of the occupation, having already bagged big money to ride shotgun for Halliburton and Bechtel as they spread their beneficent tentacles throughout the conquered land.   Now little Erinys will guard the Holy Grail of the entire invasion project: Iraq’s oil industry.

Erinys is a joint venture between a large South African freebooting firm and a few choice Iraqi investors.   How choice?   They are intimates of Ahmad Chalabi: leader of the Iraqi National Congress exile group, member of the Bush-appointed Governing Council, convicted swindler, darling of the Pentagon — and the Bush plan’s designated tyrant-to-be, the Iraqi face of a compliant, corporate-run colonial outpost in Mesopotamia.

This has been the plan all along: to install a “strongman” in Iraq who can “hold the country together” and protect the imperial flank while America “projects its dominance” over the oil wealth — and political life — of the Middle East and Central Asia.   There’s no great secret here: Team Bush has been talking about it for years in the corporate-funded “think tanks” they inhabited during the Clinton interregnum.   There, they published their dreams about a “new Pearl Harbor” that would “catalyze” the American public into supporting wide-ranging militarization at home and extensive “interventions” abroad.   This vision was most clearly articulated in a September 2000 report published by the Cheney-Rumsfeld group, Project for the New American Century.

Central to this dream — besides the Pearl Harbor bit, which those lucky duckies got only a year later — was the conquest of Iraq, a project that PNAC said “transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.”   The crimes of their now-captured errand boy — most of which (including “gassing his own people”) were committed when he was being serviced and pampered by the Reagan-Bush administrations — were always irrelevant to the PNAC catalyzers, except as a PR pitch to help sell their “transcendent” invasion.

And Chalabi was always their main man, the horse they were going to ride in on.   Despite his conviction in Jordan for massive bank fraud, despite his dubious husbandry of the millions in covert aid thrown at him by U.S. officials, despite the fact that even the CIA finally washed its hands of him, dismissing him as an ineffectual poseur peddling false intelligence to inflate his importance and attract more funding, the PNAC boys kept faith with Chalabi, as American Prospect reports.

Thus when PNAC seized power in Washington, Chalabi’s star rose again in the East.   As Newsweek reports, his group was given a direct funnel to the White House for its “intelligence” about Saddam’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction — and Chalabi’s nonexistent popularity with the Iraqi people.   He also supplied The New York Times with a steady stream of WMD scare stories that helped stoke the fever for war, the Washington Post reports.   His private, American-funded militia was ferried into Iraq in the midst of the invasion and took part in the staged toppling of Saddam’s statue by a small, hand-picked crowd in Baghdad — the much-televised symbol of “victory” in the war, Harper’s reports.   He was then named to Iraq’s “rotating interim presidency” by the Bushist conquerors.

Now, Chalabi’s cronies at Erinys are hiring Chalabi’s militiamen for the new “security" contract.   In other words, Bush has given Chalabi armed control over Iraq’s oil industry.   This has drawn strident protests from other members of the Governing Council, who know exactly what it means: Chalabi’s gun is pointed at the nation’s jugular.   But their voice is meaningless; Bush’s word alone is law in Babylon.

That’s why the occupation seems such a shambles.   The stated policies don’t really matter; they’re just window dressing for the master plan.   Thus they can be discarded the moment they’re no longer politically expedient.   What matters is getting the strongman in place — Saddam 2.0, a more obedient, more presentable, less quirky upgrade, who will “invite” a lasting American military presence and uphold Bush’s arbitrary decrees granting foreign corporations a stranglehold on the Iraqi economy.

Now, is this an evil plan, conceived in ignorance and arrogance, predicated on the war crime of military aggression, an act of terrorism on a scale than bin Laden could only dream of?   You bet.   But let’s be fair: it is a plan.   You can’t say that Bush hasn’t got one.






  
  Metropolis / Global Eye
Friday, Oct. 24, 2003. Page XII
— Thieves Like Us
By Chris Floyd

Silk lining of Dick Cheney, Bush Regime - Thieves like us
When they asked the outlaw Willie Sutton why he robbed banks, he put it to them straight:   “That’s where the money is.”

It is of course physically — not to mention politically — impossible for the corrupt cadres of the Bush Regime to give a straight answer to anything, but if they could be forced to cough up the truth behind the conquest of Iraq, their reply would be identical to Sutton’s.   For although the cadres — and the media commentariat — have thrown up a dust storm of grandiose moral, strategic and ideological “reasons” for the war, each passing week brings new proof that the whole murderous farrago boils down to one thing: loot.   “Follow the money” — Deep Throat’s abiding Suttonian wisdom — is definitely the key to penetrating the grubby mysteries of the Bushist cargo cult.

Let’s begin by following the money from the mounting pile of dead bodies in Iraq to the silk lining of Dick Cheney’s trouser pockets.   This month the mainstream American press woke up to the long-established fact that Cheney is still receiving oodles of boodle in “deferred compensation” from his old firm, Halliburton, which just happens to be the biggest gorger at the Iraqi trough.   These “revelations” forced the grim-visaged veep into a furious spin cycle: the terms of the deal were set before he took office, he’ll give all the money to charity, his probity is irreproachable, blah blah blah — the usual soft-soap, swallowed whole, as usual, by the media.

So bold was his defense that last week Bushist minions called on critics to issue a formal apology to the poor maligned unelected multimillionaire war profiteer (and former business partner of Saddam Hussein).   But even granting the ludicrous assumption that Cheney was actually telling the truth about this particular arrangement — which only involves chump change of a few hundred thousand dollars, after all — the fact is that Halliburton is using a back door to fill its former chief’s coffers with millions in blood money pumped directly from the corpses of American soldiers and Iraqi civilians.

This profitable arrangement was found hiding in plain sight last week by investigator Maggie Burns of the Progressive Populist.   While the media mandarins were gulping soap, Burns committed the increasingly rare act of journalism by checking out Cheney’s financial disclosure forms.   These show that Cheney has a minimum of $18 million invested in The Vanguard Group, a leading mutual fund.   (Given the deliberately vague, vast ranges of the “disclosure” forms, this nest-egg could be as high as $87 million.   We mere mortals are not meant to know). Vanguard, as it happens, is the 10th-largest shareholder in — oh, you guessed already! — Halliburton.   The fund owns 7.6 million shares in the firm, worth about $176 million.   Thus any government contract that swells Halliburton’s bottom line does indeed pour war profits straight into Cheney’s bulging bank accounts.   No amount of soap can wash away that fact.   Meanwhile, five of the other top 10 shareholders in Halliburton have big bucks parked with our old friends The Carlyle Group, where George Bush Sr. hangs out his shingle as a pricey corporate shill (and former bin Laden business partner).   So Bush family coffers are definitely not forgotten when Halliburton goes to war.

But do let’s be fair.   After taking a bit of mild heat for larding Halliburton, Bechtel and other Bush-blessed firms with billion-dollar no-bid contracts, the Regime announced it was “opening up” competition for war pork.   The new rules give potential contractors all of three days — or even sometimes as much as seven whole days! — to put together bids for major projects totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, The New York Times reports.

Oddly enough, most companies not already on the ground in Iraq are finding it difficult to meet these luxurious deadlines.   “Oh, your company can’t come up with specs for rebuilding the entire national highway infrastructure of Iraq in just three days?   Too bad; guess we’ll have to give it to Bechtel then.   Here ya go, Bechs — and by the way, thanks for that campaign check, pal! See ya at the ranch this weekend!”

Now this system of conquistador cronyism is going global.   In a desperate bid to get some outside help in cleaning up the ungodly, bloodsoaked mess they’ve made, the Bushists struck a UN deal last week that will allow foreign countries who contribute to the pillaging — sorry, the reconstruction — of Iraq to funnel the cash to their own politically favored firms, The Guardian reports.   Naturally, the Bushist occupation junta will “coordinate” the gobbling at this new trough, making sure the White House Vanguardians get their cut.   At last, a form of internationalism that Bush can embrace!

But the sweetheart deals get sweeter yet for Homeland gobblers like Halliburton.   First, most of the insider pork is being doled out in “cost-plus” contracts, with a company’s profits tied to a project’s “expenses.” The more costs they ring up, the greater the profit: it’s a green light for overruns, and a license to loot the public treasury.

But that’s not all: The profits from these scams are being kept secret — not only from those habitual saps, the American people, but also from the constitutionally mandated oversight of Congress, the Seattle Times reports.

Secret deals with pals and patrons, secret profits that can’t be traced, mutual funds to launder the money — and plenty of cannon fodder to do the wetwork and take the blowback: Bush has turned America into a den of thieves.

Annotations

Arnold Unplugged v It’s Hasta la Vista to $9 Billion
Gregpalast.com, Oct. 3, 2003

The Deregulator
Scoop, Oct.10, 2003

The Day of the Locust
TomDispatch, Oct. 9, 2003

President Schwarzenegger
The Nation, Oct. 7, 2003

Californians Want v and Get v a Brutish Autocrat
Newsday, Oct. 9, 2003

Schwarzenegger Asked to Explain Ken Lay Meeting
San Diego Channel 10, Oct. 14, 2003

Put Past to Rest, Hatch Says of Arnold
Salt Lake Tribune, Oct. 4, 2003

A Chronology of California’s Power Crisis
San Francisco Chronicle, April 6, 2001

The Audio-Animatronic Candidate
New York Times, Oct. 12, 2003

Economy Worries Californians, But It’s Not That Bad
New York Times, Oct. 12, 2003

Just in Time: After Election, Media Reports Truth
Daily Howler, Oct. 9, 2003

Fourth Reich
Counterpunch, Oct. 6. 2003





© Copyright 2003, The Moscow Times.   All Rights Reserved.









 





Arnold as governor blesses sweetheart settlements




Arnold in Wonderland — Curiouser and Curiouser








     Iraqi rebels turning to defeat United States     

      I am ready to sacrifice the rest of my family to defeat America. 

  And God willing we will defeat her      





State of the Union — USA




       Cluster bombs killing injuring, Iraq, Lebanon        
        US new generation of landmines called Spider        





The stovepipe — instructions [were sent] from the Top Man [Saddam]—“give them everything.”




Unspeakable grief and horror




















































Death




Sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses at Abu Ghraib by Military Intelligence




“Spec. Sabrina D. Harman, a military police officer has been charged with abusing detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq”








“It is not secret at all, there are many Israeli experts who are transferring to the Americans their accumulative experience of thirty seven years of torturing and mistreating Palestinians,” al-Sanai told Aljazeera.net.

He said that American officers joined Israeli army units in Jenin several months ago for the purpose of learning Israeli methods and techniques of repressing civilians, which the Americans, he said, later applied in Iraq.

“It took Israel 37 years to develop and perfect these barbaric methods of repression and humiliation.   Surprisingly, the Americans surpassed and outmatched the Israelis in their savagery in less than two years.”





Soldier C told the Mirror that suspects had "10 kids of crap" beaten out of them and said officers only stepped in when the appalling beatings got too heavy.

...He went up to one of the prisoners who still had a sandbag on his face and was poking his fingers into his eyeballs until the guy was screaming in pain





UK troops batter with rifle butts — warning has extremely abusive content




Outsourced civilian workers who beat, raped and humiliated iraq prisoners cannot be charged under military law, and it is unclear whether they will face any charges under either US or Iraqi laws.




Not the first incident to involve the Queen's Lancashire Regiment and allegations of brutality.   Seven people die in British custody in Iraq, none charged.




       Civilian Death Toll in Iraq May Top 1 Million     
            —  ORB, a British polling agency, September 2007          





Bush puts God on his side




Cook: Bring our lads home




'Grief and horror — Images of the young Iraqi citizens killed April 2004'




War images — one year after




John Pilger at the start of the war




In your name




Checkpoint shootings: We're sorry




Sad Farewell to Iraq




Bombs won't win us friends




Mowlam: We must step up bombing




Doubts raised of UK soldier torture photos of May, 1 2004 — many aspects suspicious




Photographs taken and given to a photo-developing shop May 2003 by a UK soldier when he returned home had enough horror pictures of Iraq males being forced naked upon the floor, being forced to commit oral sexual acts, being bent over to receive anal sexual penetration, that the young woman clerk in the store called the police.




“Where are the human rights that the U.S. is always talking about?”




US tactics fuel Iraqi anger




Depleted Uranium, its effects being seen




State of the Union — USA




US servicemen




The stovepipe — instructions [were sent] from the Top Man [Saddam]—“give them everything.”




China EU countries Russia Japan lending money to US to the tune of $2 billion (2,000,000,000.00) daily
— Bleeding Bush strategy





US Debt




Am I going insane?




Kennedy slams CIA chief        
  Iraq analysis wildly inconsistent        
     Senator we did not clear the document





Trailers




Cheney: Assessment done by department of defense




Iraq analysis wildly inconsistent




Flames of war spread into Pakistan













 
 




Faith Fippinger




South Africa — Story of South African political emancipation




The Book of Merlyn




The beating of the drum




 
 





 
For archive purposes, this article is being stored on TheWE.cc website.
The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.