For archive purposes, this article is being stored on TheWE.cc website.
The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.

 
Capsicum Spray-The Record to Date

Ian Ireland
Law and Bills Digest Group
12 February 2002


On 4 December 2001 a 33 year old man died in Brisbane from a suspected heart attack after earlier being subdued by police using oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray. The incident is being treated as a death in custody and is being investigated by the State Coroner and Criminal Justice Commission.

During the past decade OC sprays have become popular with law enforcement and corrections personnel as a less than lethal force option.

The benefits of having OC spray available to law enforcement and correctional personnel are considered to include: fewer and or less serious injuries to citizens and police officers; deterrence of violent behaviour by citizens during incidents, and fewer complaints of assault or use of excessive force by law enforcement and correctional personnel.

The use of OC spray has been tested and trialed by several law enforcement agencies in Australia and overseas.

Federal, State and Territory Governments have legislatively restricted the use and availability of OC spray (e.g.: Custom Act 1901 (Cwlth), Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) and Control of Weapons Act 1990 (Vic)).

What is capsicum spray?

Oleoresin capsicum (OC) is an extract of pepper plants of the genus Capsicum. It is used as a spice in curries and salsas, as a pharmacological agent in anaesthetic and analgesic creams and as the principal active ingredient in OC spray, or pepper spray used by police and others as an antipersonnel agent.

OC extract consists of a mix of fat soluble phenols known as capsicinoids, capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin. Capsaicinoid content of extracts used in pepper sprays varies widely. Depending on brand, an OC spray may contain water, alcohols, or organic solvents as liquid carriers; and nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or halogenated hydrocarbons as propellants to discharge canister contents. (1)

Physical effects of OC spray

When used against a person, OC spray typically has a severe impact. Skin exposure causes tingling, intense burning pain, swelling, redness and occasionally blistering.

Respiratory responses to OC spray include burning of the throat, wheezing, dry cough, shortness of breath, gagging, gasping, inability to breathe or speak and, rarely, cyanosis, apnea and respiratory arrest.

Nasal application of OC spray causes sneezing, irritation, and reflex mucus secretion. Inhalation of OC spray can cause acute hypertension which in turn can cause headache, and increase the risk of stroke or heart attack.

Common eye symptoms associated with OC spray include redness, swelling, severe burning pain, stinging, conjunctival inflammation, lacrimation, blepharospasm and involuntary or reflex closing of the eyelids. (2)

It is important to note that the effects of OC sprays may range in severity. For example, the effect of OC sprays on people with mental disorders or severely intoxicated by drugs or alcohol can be diminished. Additionally, the effect of OC spray is not necessarily immediate.

Research by the United States FBI Forensic Science Research and Training Centre and the US Chemical Research and Development Centre have not, to date, found evidence that any long-term health risks were associated with OC spray use. (3)

A number of other reports, however, have associated serious adverse consequences, including death (over 60 deaths have been attributed to OC spray in the US), with the legitimate use, as well as misuse and abuse, of OC sprays. The use of OC spray has been rejected in the United Kingdom because of its potential carcinogenic properties.(4)

A number of human rights organisations, including Amnesty International, have questioned the use of OC spray. In November 1997 Amnesty International called the use of OC spray by police in the US State of California against peaceful protestors as tantamount to torture. (5)

Use of capsicum spray in Australia

There are few publicly available statistics on the use of OC spray by Australian police services.

OC spray was first trialed and introduced operationally in Australia by the Victorian Police. Police services in South Australia, Tasmania, Queensland, Western Australia, the Northern Territory and New South Wales have all implemented OC spray, either fully or on a trial basis. The Australian Federal Police, the Australian Customs Service and the Australian Protective Service have also implemented OC spray.

The Boarder Protection Legislation Amendment Act 1999 inserted a new section 189A in the Customs Act 1901 (Cwlth) which included OC spray as an approved item of personal defence equipment for Customs Officers operating outside the territorial sea of Australia.

According to a 1999 report by the Queensland Criminal Justice Commission and Queensland Police there were:(6)
  • 35 incidents involving capsicum spray during the Queensland trial (28 of these involved people and the other incidents involved dogs);
  • in the last 6 months of 1998, the South Australian Police recorded 55 uses (these figures included use against animals); and
  • in the last half of 1998, the Victorian Police recorded 90 incidents where OC spray was discharged.
For instances involving the alleged misuse of OC spray in Australia (7)

The findings of the 1999 report of the Queensland Criminal Justice Commission and Queensland Police Service included:(8)
  • OC spray was found to be effective in subduing people threatening or assaulting police in the majority of incidents;
  • there was no conclusive evidence that OC spray availability was a deterrent to violence directed towards police, however, indications are that, with wider implementation and greater public awareness, it could make a positive impact; and
  • there were no deaths, reported injuries or other medical problems as a direct result of OC spray use.
Restrictions applying to the importation of OC spray

The importation of anti-personnel sprays and chemicals for the use in the manufacture of anti-personnel sprays was federally restricted in March 2000 by an amendment to Schedule 3 of the Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956. The provision was inserted by Customs (Prohibited Imports) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 1) [Statutory Rules 2000 No. 32]

The conditions attaching to the importation of anti-personnel sprays and chemicals are that such goods must not be imported unless:
  • the written consent of the Minister, the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police or the commissioner (however designated) of the police force of a State or Territory, is produced to a Collector [of Customs]; and
  • the goods are imported for the use of the Australian Federal Police, a police force of a State or Territory or a correctional institution of a State or Territory.
Comment

OC spray has not replaced lethal weapons as a use of force option by police and corrections personnel in Australia.

There is no evidence that the use of OC spray has reduced the rate of police killings and deaths in police custody.

OC spray has given law enforcement and corrections personnel an additional weapon for use in resolving physically threatening and dangerous incidents.

The most problematical use of OC spray will occur when persons are engaged in political demonstrations or are already in police or correctional custody.

  1. http:www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6416/smith-ok.html.
  2. ibid.
  3. Queensland Criminal Justice Commission and Queensland Police, Trial of Capsicum Spray in Queensland: Evaluation Report, 1999, p. 2.
  4. http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6416/smith-ok.html; http://mediafilter.org/caq/CAQ56pepper.html, and http://www.interlog.com/~cjazz/pepper2.htm.
  5. http://www.web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/index/AMR510671997.
  6. Queensland Criminal Justice Commission and Queensland Police, Trial of Capsicum Spray in Queensland: Evaluation Report, 1999, op. cit., p. v-vii.
  7. see:http://www.cat.org.au/aoa/documents/capsicum.html.
  8. Queensland Criminal Justice Commission and Queensland Police, Trial of Capsicum Spray in Queensland: Evaluation Report, 1999, op. cit., pp. 30-31.

Research Note 19 2001-02



© Commonwealth of Australia






miamiherald.com — The miamiherald home page
Posted on Sat, Dec. 20, 2003

A public hearing that attracted more than 150 union workers and activists critical of police action during last month's trade protests in Miami began with a photo montage: a line of officers in riot gear, clouds of pepper spray floating over marchers and a man whose arm had been bruised and bloodied by rubber bullets.

''I am ashamed of my city and how it treated working people,'' said Fred Frost, president of the South Florida AFL-CIO, addressing a packed conference room at the United Teachers of Dade headquarters on Tuesday night.
'BROKE PROMISES': Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO secretary-treasurer, addresses a forum Tuesday in Miami on police action during November's FTAA protests.

At left is Fred Frost, president of the South Florida
AFL-CIO.

RONNA GRADUS/FOR THE HERALD'BROKE PROMISES': Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO secretary-treasurer, addresses a forum Tuesday in Miami on police action during November's FTAA protests.
At left is Fred Frost, president of the South Florida AFL-CIO.

RONNA GRADUS/FOR THE HERALD



The forum, sponsored by the AFL-CIO and the Alliance for Retired Citizens, was designed as a public hearing to air the litany of complaints against the Miami Police Department and the other law enforcement agencies assembled to patrol the city during the Free Trade Area of the Americas talks in November.

The criticisms have largely centered on the events of Nov. 20, when two unpermitted marches resulted in hundreds of arrests and allegations from civil rights groups that the police used unnecessary force to disperse the crowd.

Compounding their frustration, said labor leaders, was that busloads of union members and retirees trying to get to Bayfront Amphitheater were denied access to a rally and march -- despite assurances from city leaders that they would be admitted.

''We trained hundreds of union volunteers to serve as peacekeepers for our events. We paid thousands of dollars in extra security costs to meet police department requirements,'' said Richard Trumka, secretary-treasurer of the national AFL-CIO. ``They kept raising the bar, and we kept meeting it. And they broke every promise they made to us.''

Miami police spokesman Lt. Bill Schwartz dismissed the labor leader's allegations.

''Not true,'' he said, when told of Trumka's comments. ``We went above and beyond to facilitate everyone's rights for freedom of speech. If anyone felt this was not true, they are not being honest with themselves or the public.''

Schwartz said the actions taken throughout the trade protests were in the interest of public safety.

City leaders have said the massive police presence, which included a coalition of more than three dozen law enforcement agencies, was in anticipation of a small group of agitators intent on causing trouble. Two citizens' panels and both Miami and Miami-Dade police are conducting reviews.

Speakers ''testifying'' at the forum -- which also featured a table to sign affidavits for future legal action -- allege a pattern of harassment and intimidation during the talks.

Trumka, who called for the resignation of Miami police Chief John Timoney, said he was searched by police while trying to enter a restaurant.

Others described retirees walking blocks, some with walkers or artificial legs, after police turned them away from a rally.

RELATED LINKS
Read the transcript with comments from the judge
Coverage of FTAA meeting


Copyright







 
 



















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































 
 





 
For archive purposes, this article is being stored on TheWE.cc website.
The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.