Luke Rudkowski: G8?
George Galloway: Many of us believe that another world is possible a better world is possible.
We believe that the people gathering for the G8 are the cause of our problems rather than the solution to them.
It's not their presence that I am opposed to, it's the agenda they are following.
These people on tax, trade and transparency they are the masters of tax avoidance and evasion, the masters of some of the most notorious tax havens and shelters in the world.
Luke Rudkowski: There should be no reason to have them at all.
George Galloway: The British speak as always with a forked tongue.
They claim they want to do something about tax havens while making sure that their own tax havens are the site of as much buried treasure as possible.
No pirate in history has been as successful as the British Empire is squirreling away other people's wealth.
But all of them follow an economic model that has beggared the world.
Luke Rudkowski: Bilderberg?
George Galloway: The ruling class do not need a conference to decide its priorities in which direction it should be facing.
As the wild animal knows that it must attack and eat in order to live, so the ruling class knows what it must do to continue to rule. |
|
Forgotten in Iraq
Arnaud Mafille
Sourch of this article CagePrisoners.com
The story of Shawki
|
Shawki Ahmed Omar is a 52 year old American citizen born in Kuwait to Palestinian-Jordanian parents.
In the early 80s, he travelled to the United States to study.
After marrying an American citizen with whom he had six children, he held a number of jobs in order to support his family.
They were mainly in apartment maintenance.
In 1995, the family moved to Jordan so that their children could learn Arabic and discover their father’s culture.
Shawki travelled back and forth, making a living in the US for his family in Jordan.
After the American invasion of Iraq, he was sent to Iraq by a well-established company run by his brother to seek reconstruction contracts.
One night in Ramadan in 2004, American forces broke into the house in which Shawki was staying, beat him and arrested him. For the next two weeks, his family had no idea of his whereabouts.
Like many non-Iraqi Arabs in Iraq at that time, he was probably suspected by the US of having links with the local armed insurgency.
Shawki was imprisoned by US forces for nearly eight years without charge in the well-known detention centres of Abu Ghraib, Camp Cropper and Camp Bucca.
Reports of his treatment, from his family, indicate that much of the abuse he suffered was concentrated around the genital area.
He reported that he was repeatedly thrown into a pool of water where he felt he came close to death before he was taken out and that he was also subjected to torture by electricity.
Pictures of him taken at that time by US authorities were declassified and made available to his family for legal purposes. They clearly show marks of mistreatment. |
![]() Shawki Ahmed Omar US military photo made available to family for legal purposes |
|
Attempts to challenge his arrest and treatment have failed.
A habeas corpus petition was filed the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on his behalf by his 'closest friend' (his wife and son) in 2005.
The case went up to the Supreme Court, which ruled on 12 June 2008 that American courts had no jurisdiction over his case.
According to the judgment, he was 'being held in Iraq by American forces operating pursuant to a UN mandate and at the request of the Iraqi Government.'
The right to habeas corpus could not, the court said, 'does not require the United States to shelter such fugitives from the criminal justice system of the sovereign with authority to prosecute them'.
The American forces eventually handed him over to the Iraqi authorities in 2011.
Completed all the legal formalities
The previous year, while in US custody, Shawki was accused by the Iraqi authorities of having entered the country illegally, a charge which he denies. He had completed all the legal formalities required at that time, even informing the American embassy in Syria of his travel plans.
A hearing was fixed for 15 July 2010 at the Central Criminal Court of Iraq, a Baghdad-based Iraqi court. However, he managed from prison to call his family to inform them it would actually be heard on 24 June (he had not been allowed to contact his lawyer to inform him of this change).
Alerted by the family, the lawyer went to the court and was assured the trial was still to be held on 15 July.
But on 10 July, his family received another call from him, telling them that he had in fact been tried on 24 June and sentenced to 15 years.
Nothing to defend himself
His lawyer was not present and Shawki did not have any paper work to defend himself.
His sentence was reduced to seven years on appeal (not including the time already served during the American time.)
At the end of his sentence, Shawki will have spent 14 years in prison.
All along Shawki has insisted that his prosecution was a case of mistaken identity.
The details in the case were actually those of Shawki Ahmed Sharif, a Palestinian, instead of his own, Shawki Ahmed Omar, American citizen.
Based on the testimony of two other inmates, which they say was obtained under torture; Shawki was also indicted on terrorism charges.
Since then, the two men have been released and in writing recanted their 'confession.'
However, the Iraq authorities refuse to acknowledge these retractions.
After nine years in custody, the Iraq authorities still have not permitted Shawki’s lawyer to access his file.
The family fears that the Iraqi authorities are purposely delaying his terrorism trial until he completes his first sentence on immigration charges.
This exposes him to the possibility of another jail term, to be served separately, or even to the death penalty.
Sourch of this article for CagePrisoners.com click here.
For Uruknet click here |
![]() Shawki Ahmed Omar Before being imprisoned |
His 7-year-old daughter, who was born after Shawki Omar's arrest, participated in the demonstrations to draw attention to the high risk of torture to which he is again exposed.
Shawki Omar was among the Arabs of non-Iraqi origin who were collectively suspected of belonging to the 'armed resistance' against US forces after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Many of them were subjected to torture and subsequent arbitrary detention.
Shawki Omar's case represents many of these aspects of human rights violations as well.
After his arrest in October 2004, he had been held in a secret place for two weeks and his family was not informed about his whereabouts.
He was beaten and tortured in order to extract confessions regarding his alleged links to members of the Iraqi insurgent movement.
Several years later, these confessions were held against him during unfair trial.
Unable to benefit from legal counsel either, he was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment for illegal entry to Iraq.
In addition to the years of arbitrary detention in dire prison conditions, Alkarama was informed by Mr Omar's family members that he was again subjected to torture in recent months.
During his interrogation sessions which resumed at the end of November and the beginning of December 2012, he was subjected to beatings and threatened to be transferred to a secret detention facility for harsher treatment.
Other detainees came out of similar questioning sessions with fractured bones and burns.
"We [the prisoners] feel that the prison authorities are increasingly violent to the point that abuse becomes routine," he said when speaking to his wife.
Alkarama fears for the physical and mental health of Shawki Omar as he is in constant danger of torture, especially if he should be transferred to a secret detention facility.
Certain detainees were recently transferred out of Karakh Prison and their current whereabouts are completely unknown, indeed.
Therefore, Alkarama sent an urgent appeal to the Special Rapporteur on Torture, requesting his immediate intervention with the Iraqi authorities.
Iraq: Imminent risk of torture of Shawki Omar during frequent transfers Hunger strike
Alkarama, 24 May 2013
We informed the Special Rapporteur on Torture about his case on 30 January 2013.
Concerns for his physical and mental integrity run again high after we learned that, three days ago, he was taken away from his cell and his current whereabouts remain uncertain.
Already when Mr Omar was interrogated and subjected to harsh beatings at the end of last year, he was threatened to be transferred to a secret detention facility for harsher treatment.
Now, after an ICRC visit to Karkh prison on 6 May 2013, the Jordanian national with US citizenship was transferred to the prison's section for criminals of common law, where the situation is reported to be less safe for foreigners.
|
On 16 May 2013, he was again moved, this time to a section where detention conditions are said to be better.
Speaking to Alkarama, his wife said: "I fear for my husband because some detainees reported me that he stopped drinking".
This came after Mr Omar's cell was violently searched by prison guards who broke his fan and television on 19 May 2013.
It is in protest of this that Mr Omar is now believed to refuse liquids, although he developed health problems due to the hunger strike he had announced earlier already.
Alkarama was now informed that Mr Omar was again pulled out his cell on 21 May 2013, but this time to an unknown place.
His relatives as well as the ICRC contacted the prison authorities in order to receive further information on his fate and whereabouts, but to no avail.
His current situation remains unclear.
Alkarama fears for Mr Omar's physical and psychological integrity as he is at high risk of torture while being prevented from contacting his family and receiving visits from international bodies.
We therefore renewed our submission to the Special Rapporteur on Torture today, asking his immediate intervention with the Iraqi authorities.
|
Man Behind Syrian ‘Chemical Weapons’ Claim Is Fiction Writer Who Ran Benghazi Cover-Up
Paul Craig Roberts Infowars.com June 14, 2013 Excerpts of article with additional subheadings by TheWE.cc |
Ben Rhodes, the White House national security advisor behind the claim that President Bashar Al-Assad used chemical weapons in Syria, is a fiction writer who also played a key role in covering up the truth behind the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.
Yesterday, Rhodes announced that the White House had “high confidence” that the Syrian Army had used chemical weapons, providing no evidence, and that the Obama administration would now take steps to arm FSA rebels, who as has been widely documented are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists who killed U.S. troops in Iraq.
Kinetic military action
35-year-old Rhodes has been a speechwriter for Obama since 2007 and now enjoys the role of deputy national security adviser for strategic communication.
He created the infamous term “kinetic military action” to describe the bombardment of Libya which allowed Obama to skirt around the constitutional question of having to declare war.
Rhodes’ expertise revolves around manufacturing narratives.
Delete references to terrorists involved in attack on US consulate in Benghazi
As Stephen Hayes documents in a lengthy Weekly Standard piece, Rhodes was instrumental in altering CIA talking points to delete references to Islamic terrorists being involved in the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.
Setting foundation for the Obama administration cover-up of the incident by claiming the siege was a demonstration against an anti-Muslim film.
This an attempt to hide the fact that the White House had supported Al-Qaeda terrorists in the overthrow of Gaddafi, just as they are now doing in Syria.
Rhodes can also count on the support of the US corporate media in selling fairytales about chemical weapons, since his brother David is the president of CBS News.
Writes Daniel McAdams:
“Just a few weeks ago the US Intelligence Community did not believe claims that the Syrian government used chemicals.
Then, after scolded by the Israelis they changed their tune to a very qualified 'maybe.'
Now, with no formal investigation at all and no word on the chain of evidence or its source, we are told with absolute certainty that the Assad government has used the weapons.
And they can’t tell us because it is secret!
Syrian opposition terrorists using chemical weapons
Innumerable examples of Obama-backed Syrian rebels obtaining and using chemical weapons including the recent discovery by Turkish police of 2kg of sarin nerve gas in the hands of Al-Nusra terrorists have been conveniently swept aside.
The question of why the Syrian Army, which has been achieving battlefield victories via conventional means for months, would use chemical weapons on a limited scale with no appreciable advantage other than to draw international condemnation and a pretext for US involvement, remains unanswered.
In pledging to increase military support for Syrian rebels and preparing a no fly zone, the Obama administration is openly aiding terrorists who have sworn allegiance to Al-Qaeda.
Immediately after the State Department declared Jabhat al-Nusra a terrorist organization, 29 different FSA rebel outfits pledged allegiance to the Al-Qaeda group.
For complete article with links click here
© 2013 Infowars.com is a Free Speech Systems, LLC company. All rights reserved |
|
|
Turkey finds sarin gas in homes of suspected Syrian Islamists May 31, 2013 |
Turkish security forces found a 2kg cylinder with sarin gas after searching the homes of Syrian militants from the Al-Qaeda linked Al-Nusra Front who were previously detained, Turkish media reports. The gas was reportedly going to be used in a bomb.
The sarin gas was found in the homes of suspected Syrian Islamists detained in the southern provinces of Adana and Mersia following a search by Turkish police on Wednesday, reports say. The gas was allegedly going to be used to carry out an attack in the southern Turkish city of Adana.
12 suspected members of the Al-Nusra Front arrested
On Monday, Turkish special anti-terror forces arrested 12 suspected members of the Al-Nusra Front, the Al-Qaeda affiliated group which has been dubbed "the most aggressive and successful arm” of the Syrian rebels. The group was designated a terrorist organization by the United States in December.
Police also reportedly found a cache of weapons, documents and digital data which will be reviewed by police.
Following the searches, five of those detained were released following medical examinations at the Forensic Medicine Institution Adana. Seven suspects remain in custody. Turkish authorities are yet to comment on the arrests.
Syrian militants in possession of sarin gas
Russia reacted strongly to the incident, calling for a thorough investigation into the detention of Syrian militants in possession of sarin gas.
|
"We are extremely concerned with media reports. Russia believes that the use of any chemical weapons is absolutely inadmissible,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said on Thursday.
In a separate incident in Adana, police reportedly received intelligence that an explosive-laden vehicle had entered the town of Adana on Thursday, the Taraf daily reports.
Ankara has attempted to bolster the Syrian opposition without becoming embroiled in the Syrian civil war, a policy which Damascus claims lead to the deadliest act of terrorism on Turkish soil.
On May 11, 51 people were killed and 140 injured after two car bombs exploded in the Turkish town of Reyhanli, located near the country’s border with Syria.
A dozen Turkish nationals have been charged in the twin bombings, and Ankara has accused Damascus of helping the suspects carry out the attack.
"This incident was carried out by an organization which is in close contact to pro-regime groups in Syria and I say this very clearly, with the Syrian Mukhabarat [intelligence agency]," Interior Minister Muammer Guler said.
|
Syria’s Information Minister Omran Zoubi denied any link the attack, saying his country: "Did not commit and would never commit such an act because our values would not allow that".
Zoubi further charged the Turkish government had facilitated the flow of arms, explosives, funds and fighters across the country’s border into Syria, claiming that that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his party bear direct responsibility [for the attack]."
Syria invites UN to investigate
In March, the Syrian government invited the United Nations to investigate possible chemical weapons use in the Khan al-Assal area of rural Aleppo. Military experts and officials said a chemical agent, most likely sarin, was used in the attack which killed 26 people, including government forces.
Damascus claimed Al-Qaeda linked fighters were behind the attack, further alleging Turkey had a hand in the incident.
“The rocket came from a placed controlled by the terrorist and which is located close to the Turkish territory. One can assume that the weapon came from Turkey,” Zoabi said in an interview with Interfax news agency.
Does similar red line apply to opposition groups?
US President Barack Obama has warned any confirmed use of chemical weapons by Damascus would cross a 'red line' which would prompt further action. Both Washington and London claimed there was growing evidence that such chemical agents had been used.
Less clear perhaps is whether a similar red line would apply to Syrian opposition groups such as Al-Nusra by the US and NATO allies. Author and historian Gerald Horne, for one, told RT that there are greater political dynamics at work.
Gerald Horne:
“Well, one would think so, but of course we know that the United States along with its NATO partners Britain and France are quite close to the main backers of the rebels I’m speaking of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
We know, for example, according to the Financial Times that Mr Sarkozy, the former president of France, is in very close financial relationship with the Qataris.”
That would be under the existing paragraph in the story: US President Barack Obama has warned any confirmed use of chemical weapons by Damascus would cross a 'red line' which would prompt further action.
|
Both Washington and London claimed there was growing evidence that such chemical agents had been used.
Hushed or directed elsewhere
This case being similar to an earlier one, with the findings of UN chemical weapons expert Carla Del Ponte who had found evidence of their use by the rebels some think the fallout will be what it was then as well.
Journalist and RT contributor, Afshin Rattansi believes that the same fate will befall this story, as far as media coverage goes.
All possible doubts will either be hushed or directed elsewhere, as they were toward Del Ponte’s findings.
“Carla Del Ponte one of the greatest experts on this from the United Nations did do an in-depth investigation only a few weeks ago, and of course, the mainstream media tried their best to ignore it and to character-assassinate Del Ponte… she did masses of work on this, and [found] It was the rebels and not the government.”
News management incredibly sophisticated
Rattansi goes on to say that:
“The news management of the Syria story has been incredibly sophisticated, and I don’t think it will be on the front pages of any newspapers in Britain or the United States it will quietly disappear like Del Ponte’s case.
The big story, of course, will be Russia and the delivery of the S-300.”
A day before the Reyhanli bombing, Erdogan released a statement claiming he had evidence the Syrian government had had used chemical weapons, crossing the red line set by President Obama.
|
The accusation contradicted a statement made at the time by a leading UN investigator.
Carla Del Ponte, who heads The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, said there were “concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas” in Syria.
"This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities," Del Ponte continued.
Exposure to large quantities of sarin gas, whose production and stockpiling was outlawed by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, causes convulsions, paralysis, loss of respiratory functions and potentially death.
Copyright © Autonomous Nonprofit Organization "TV-Novosti" 2005–2013. All rights reserved. |
Russia slams 'fabricated' info on Syria's use of chemical weapons Fri Jun 14, 2013 Hawkish US Senator John McCain, who is a staunch supporter of arming the militants in Syria, said on June 13 that Washington should even think of plans other than sending weapons to the militants “to change the equation on the battleground.”
Alexei Pushkov, who is head of the foreign policy committee in the lower chamber of the Russian parliament, said in a Friday message posted on Twitter that the information has been concocted in a similar fashion as lies about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction prior to Washington's invasion of the Arab state in 2003.
|
The US claims that Syria has used chemical weapons against the militants, implying that the government of Assad has crossed Washington's 'red line.'ť
Syria strongly rejects the claims as “lies,”ť saying that the militants have used chemical weapons on several occasions, including an attack in the region of Khan al-Assal in the northwestern province of Aleppo, where over two dozen people died.
On June 13, US Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said in a White House statement that his country's intelligence community assesses that “the Assad regime has used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year.”
He also said Washington and the international community have a number of “other legal, financial, diplomatic, and military responses available,” noting that they are “prepared for all contingencies, and we will make decisions on our own timeline.”
US President Barack Obama had previously said Syria's crossing the red line would prompt Washington to become more involved in the conflict in the Arab country by providing the militants with military support.
Meanwhile, the Russian legislator further said, “Obama is taking the same path as George Bush.”
Senator John McCain who is a staunch supporter of arming the militants in Syria has said that the US should even think of plans other than sending weapons to the militants “to change the equation on the battleground.”
MR/
© 2013 Press TV. All rights reserved. |
‘Syrians want to go on living in secular, tolerant state’ June 12, 2013 |
|
The people didn’t see Syria as perfect before the civil war, but it was a secular, tolerant state, which will be lost if Islamist rebels prevail, European MP Nick Griffin, who in Damascus with a fact-finding delegation, told RT.
Two suicide blasts rocked the Syrian capital Damascus this Tuesday, killing at least 14 people and wounding 31 more.
The attacks come after the Syrian army retook the strategic town of Qusair from the rebels last week in what some see as a turning point in the war.
Jitters in Washington over gains by Syria troops
There are now jitters in Washington over the recent gains by Assad troops, which, according to AP, could approve sending weapons to the rebels as early as this week, with a no-fly zone also among the options.
British National Party leader and European MP Nick Griffin has called the involvement in Syria “a criminal action” on the part of the US.
He also warned that by arming the Islamists, the Obama administration will provide arms to the same people, who launched the 9/11 attack on America.
RT: Damascus has been rocked by blasts today, but you've been describing life there 'normal'. Why is that?
People who are strict Muslims and others who are secular
Nick Griffin: Well, ‘normal’ in terms of when you walk around the streets there’s ordinary people, there’s families, there’s people who are strict Muslims and others who are secular.
Getting on with their lives and trying to ignore the bomb blasts which go off occasionally.
I’ve seen the same thing in Northern Ireland. People get used to this. Life continues.
Certainly, in Damascus this is a state under attack, it’s not a state in crisis.
British money
RT: You say you want to highlight the risk of the British government supporting the Syrian opposition. What are those risks, as you see it?
NG: Fundamentally, it’s a question of blowback.
You remember what happened in Afghanistan when the West, the CIA, the British state armed AL-Qaeda to fight the Soviet Union.
And then of course, once the Soviet Union was finished the jihadis didn’t go away, they turned their attention elsewhere.
Giant terrorist training camp
And what we’ve got now, they’re managing to turn huge parts fortunately shrinking parts of presence in Syria into a giant terrorist training camp.
The majority of people fighting in Syria against the Syrian government are foreign terrorists, tens of thousands of them, including hundreds from the EU, some of them even in Britain.
When the war is over here they’re going to come back to Britain, come back to Western Europe and continue their jihad, but this time we’ll be the targets.
Criminal drive to destroy secular Syria
RT: Do you expect the US to go ahead with weapons supplies to the opposition, given the army gains we've seen?
NG: I fear that the US will go ahead with weapon supplies.
There are a number of people a number of organizations and countries involved in this criminal drive to destroy secular Syria.
One of them is the US government, not ordinary American people.
They’re working out a plan which was produced at the start of the century by a group calling itself the Project for New American Century and they wanted to secure energy supplies for the US and also to contain Russia.
That’s what this attack on Syria is the latest of this criminal action by the US.
They’re not the only ones to blame, but they’re a significant part of it.
So I fear they’ll probably want to go ahead and arm these rebels, even though in doing so they’re arming the same people as attacked the US on 9/11.
RT: You're there with other pan-European politicians.
What's their assessment of Syria right now? Are they hopeful diplomacy can succeed at this stage?
Syria was secular and tolerant where no one cared if someone was Sunni or Shia or Christian or Jewish
NG: In particular, the most important others are members of the Flemish Belgian parliament.
I think we’re all pretty much in agreement, with what we’ve seen.
We’ve also been able to talk with ordinary Syrians at all sorts of different levels.
Something that comes out from all those people who we speak to is that Syria wasn’t perfect, but it was a secular and tolerant state where no one even cared if someone was Sunni or Shia or Christian or Jewish.
They go on with it and that’s the thing, which is going to be destroyed if this carries on.
And everyone I was there with, I think, gets this point and agrees with me and the vast majority of people in Britain, that we shouldn’t be involved in other peoples’ quarrels.
The Syrians have problems to sort out.
Those are problems of a question for Syria to sort out through ballot box, not through foreign terrorists and foreign military intervention.
Copyright © Autonomous Nonprofit Organization "TV-Novosti" 2005–2013. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|
|
Unspeakable grief and horror
...and the circus of deception continues... | |||
|
| Kewe Archives | News you might have missed | TheWE.cc | The Planet |